Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 04:50 (From 10:11 to 05:21) | 41.8% |
| Wall Balls | 02:44 (From 07:13 to 04:29) | 23.7% |
| BBJ | 02:22 (From 08:07 to 05:45) | 20.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:58 (From 05:32 to 04:34) | 8.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 (From 02:53 to 02:33) | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 (From 05:17 to 05:01) | 2.3% |
| Rowing | 00:03 (From 05:20 to 05:17) | 0.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:58 to 01:58) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 36:21 to 36:21) | 0.0% |
| HAPIOT ADELINE | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:04 | 00:00 | 05:09 -01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:17 | 04:04 | 05:07 +00:10 | 05:09 -01:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:23 | 09:21 | 05:27 -01:04 | 10:16 -00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 13:44 | 02:46 +00:07 | 15:43 -01:59 |
| Running 3 | 04:28 | 16:37 | 05:46 -01:18 | 18:29 -01:52 |
| Sled Pull | 10:11 | 21:05 | 05:44 +04:27 | 24:15 -03:10 |
| Running 4 | 04:34 | 31:16 | 05:48 -01:14 | 29:59 +01:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:07 | 35:50 | 06:03 +02:04 | 35:47 +00:03 |
| Running 5 | 04:24 | 43:57 | 05:55 -01:31 | 41:50 +02:07 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 48:21 | 05:22 -00:02 | 47:45 +00:36 |
| Running 6 | 04:38 | 53:41 | 05:48 -01:10 | 53:07 +00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 58:19 | 02:16 -00:18 | 58:55 -00:36 |
| Running 7 | 04:32 | 01:00:17 | 05:47 -01:15 | 01:01:11 -00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:32 | 01:04:49 | 04:43 +00:49 | 01:06:58 -02:09 |
| Running 8 | 05:22 | 01:10:21 | 06:12 -00:50 | 01:11:41 -01:20 |
| Wall Balls | 07:13 | 01:15:43 | 04:52 +02:21 | 01:17:53 -02:10 |
| Roxzone | 06:51 | 01:29:39 | 06:54 -00:03 | 01:29:39 |
Adeline Hapiot showed a remarkable performance in the 2024 Paris Hyrox race, ranking in the top 10% of all athletes and the top 11% in her age group. Her overall time was 01:29:39. The highlight of her performance was her running ability, which was significantly faster than the average competitor. Her total running time was 00:36:21, which was 09:51 faster than the average time. This shows that Adeline is a strong runner, excelling in all running segments compared to the average competitor. The pace she set from the beginning was fast and she managed to maintain it throughout the race.
Despite her impressive running performance, there are several areas where Adeline can improve. Here are the identified areas and the specific training strategies and techniques to enhance her performance:
Adeline should consider the following strategies for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chandler Julia | 2024 Toronto | 01:29:18 | |
| Etchison Brittany | 2023 Chicago | 01:29:17 | |
| Almotory Asmaa | 2024 Dubai | 01:29:22 | |
| Sblewski Stefanie | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:29:17 | |
| Pepping Tamara | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:29:48 | |
| Shui Chelsey | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:29:14 | |
| Franchi Stefania | 2024 Turin | 01:29:56 | |
| Blais Brigitte | 2023 Chicago | 01:29:18 | |
| Wallis Julie | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:30:01 | |
| Rooney Rachel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Bordeaux HAPIOT ADELINE | 01:38:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
HAPIOT ADELINE
