Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Thomas Owen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Thomas Owen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Thomas Owen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Thomas Owen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:58 | 07:04 to 05:06 | 40.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:12 | 05:20 to 04:08 | 24.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:49 | 04:56 to 04:07 | 16.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 04:34 to 04:11 | 7.8% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:45 to 04:30 | 5.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 04:08 to 03:58 | 3.4% |
| Run Total | 00:06 | 37:48 to 37:42 | 2.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:34 to 01:34 | 0.0% |
| Thomas Owen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:50 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 04:50 | 04:19 +00:15 | 04:18 +00:32 |
| Running 2 | 04:37 | 09:24 | 04:34 +00:03 | 08:37 +00:47 |
| Sled Push | 01:56 | 14:01 | 02:38 -00:42 | 13:11 +00:50 |
| Running 3 | 04:50 | 15:57 | 04:57 -00:07 | 15:49 +00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:08 | 20:47 | 04:22 -00:14 | 20:46 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 04:44 | 24:55 | 04:55 -00:11 | 25:08 -00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:56 | 29:39 | 04:35 +00:21 | 30:03 -00:24 |
| Running 5 | 04:45 | 34:35 | 05:03 -00:18 | 34:38 -00:03 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 39:20 | 04:37 +00:08 | 39:41 -00:21 |
| Running 6 | 04:32 | 44:05 | 04:57 -00:25 | 44:18 -00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:34 | 48:37 | 01:59 -00:25 | 49:15 -00:38 |
| Running 7 | 04:46 | 50:11 | 04:55 -00:09 | 51:14 -01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:20 | 54:57 | 04:30 +00:50 | 56:09 -01:12 |
| Running 8 | 04:47 | 01:00:17 | 05:23 -00:36 | 01:00:39 -00:22 |
| Wall Balls | 07:04 | 01:05:04 | 05:40 +01:24 | 01:06:02 -00:58 |
| Roxzone | 05:34 | 01:17:32 | 05:50 -00:16 | 01:17:32 |
Owen Thomas delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank in the top 14% of all participants, and top 16% in his age group. His overall time of 01:17:32 indicates a solid performance, especially highlighted by his total running time of 00:37:48, which is 01:38 faster than the average. This suggests Owen has a strong runner profile, evidenced by his consistently fast running splits, particularly his exceptional 6th running segment.
However, Owen's pacing strategy appears to have been slightly conservative at the start, as he began slower than average in the first running segment. This could indicate a cautious approach that may have limited his performance potential in the early stages of the race. His strengths clearly lie in running and certain strength exercises like the sled push and farmers carry.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Go Junyoung | 2024 Incheon | 01:17:36 | |
| Barry Alan | 2023 Dublin | 01:17:07 | |
| Priston Andrew | 2023 London | 01:17:25 | |
| Ruiz Miler Juan | 2024 Madrid | 01:18:01 | |
| Field Matt | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:43 | |
| Fuente Peñil Marco | 2024 Bilbao | 01:17:39 | |
| Kocum Kerem | 2024 Cape Town | 01:17:21 | |
| Abromeit Tim | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:17:49 | |
| Downey Craig | 2024 Madrid | 01:17:03 | |
| Huxtable Harry | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Sydney | 01:25:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
