Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Reynolds Connor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Reynolds Connor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Reynolds Connor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Reynolds Connor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:04 | 06:02 to 04:58 | 30.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:52 | 03:06 to 02:14 | 24.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:34 | 02:18 to 01:44 | 16.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:32 | 04:24 to 03:52 | 15.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:19 | 04:17 to 03:58 | 9.1% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:34 to 04:28 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:12 to 04:10 | 1.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:40 to 03:40 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:41 to 36:41 | 0.0% |
| Reynolds Connor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:48 | 00:00 | 04:14 +00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 04:48 | 04:17 -00:05 | 04:14 +00:34 |
| Running 2 | 04:19 | 09:00 | 04:31 -00:12 | 08:31 +00:29 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 13:19 | 02:36 +00:30 | 13:02 +00:17 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 16:25 | 04:53 -00:09 | 15:38 +00:47 |
| Sled Pull | 04:24 | 21:09 | 04:18 +00:06 | 20:31 +00:38 |
| Running 4 | 04:26 | 25:33 | 04:51 -00:25 | 24:49 +00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:17 | 29:59 | 04:28 -00:11 | 29:40 +00:19 |
| Running 5 | 04:32 | 34:16 | 04:58 -00:26 | 34:08 +00:08 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 38:48 | 04:35 -00:01 | 39:06 -00:18 |
| Running 6 | 04:32 | 43:22 | 04:52 -00:20 | 43:41 -00:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 47:54 | 01:56 +00:22 | 48:33 -00:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:34 | 50:12 | 04:51 -00:17 | 50:29 -00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:40 | 54:46 | 04:25 -00:45 | 55:20 -00:34 |
| Running 8 | 04:49 | 58:26 | 05:13 -00:24 | 59:45 -01:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:02 | 01:03:15 | 05:33 +00:29 | 01:04:58 -01:43 |
| Roxzone | 07:01 | 01:16:09 | 05:38 +01:23 | 01:16:09 |
Connor Reynolds showed an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham race, ranking in the top 15% of all athletes and top 19% in his age group (25-29). His overall time of 01:16:09 is commendable. Of particular note is his running time, which at 00:36:41, is 01:58 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. His best running lap was completed in 00:04:19.
Connor's initial pace in the first running segment was slower than average, but his pace picked up significantly in the following segments, consistently beating the average times. This suggests a controlled and strategic start, with a strong acceleration as the race progressed.
While Connor's overall performance was strong, there were certain areas where he fell behind the average time. The segments with the most potential for improvement include:
Based on this analysis, a few key race strategies can be recommended for Connor:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Janzon David | 2024 Hamburg | 01:16:30 | |
| Leckner Jack | 2024 New York | 01:16:01 | |
| Lai Cheuk Fai | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:16:27 | |
| Nava Diego | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:16:01 | |
| Sadowski Michal | 2024 Gdansk | 01:16:20 | |
| Koller Patrick | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:16:20 | |
| Sepulveda Andrew | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:16:36 | |
| Rath Erich | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:16:35 | |
| Wassermann Timo | 2024 Hamburg | 01:16:17 | |
| Tricot Tomer | 2024 London | 01:16:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
