Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:34 (From 46:54 to 45:20) | 28.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:09 (From 05:46 to 04:37) | 21.2% |
| BBJ | 01:07 (From 06:57 to 05:50) | 20.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:49 (From 06:14 to 05:25) | 15.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 (From 02:30 to 02:08) | 6.7% |
| Rowing | 00:13 (From 05:31 to 05:18) | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 (From 05:10 to 05:03) | 2.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 (From 02:40 to 02:35) | 1.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 03:59 to 03:59) | 0.0% |
| Hodges Amanda | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:17 | 00:00 | 05:11 -00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:10 | 04:17 | 05:08 +00:02 | 05:11 -00:54 |
| Running 2 | 05:37 | 09:27 | 05:30 +00:07 | 10:19 -00:52 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 15:04 | 02:44 -00:04 | 15:49 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 17:44 | 05:47 +00:02 | 18:33 -00:49 |
| Sled Pull | 06:14 | 23:33 | 05:48 +00:26 | 24:20 -00:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:59 | 29:47 | 05:50 +00:09 | 30:08 -00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:57 | 35:46 | 06:11 +00:46 | 35:58 -00:12 |
| Running 5 | 06:09 | 42:43 | 05:57 +00:12 | 42:09 +00:34 |
| Rowing | 05:31 | 48:52 | 05:23 +00:08 | 48:06 +00:46 |
| Running 6 | 05:55 | 54:23 | 05:51 +00:04 | 53:29 +00:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 01:00:18 | 02:15 +00:15 | 59:20 +00:58 |
| Running 7 | 05:53 | 01:02:48 | 05:50 +00:03 | 01:01:35 +01:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:46 | 01:08:41 | 04:50 +00:56 | 01:07:25 +01:16 |
| Running 8 | 07:18 | 01:14:27 | 06:15 +01:03 | 01:12:15 +02:12 |
| Wall Balls | 03:59 | 01:21:45 | 04:57 -00:58 | 01:18:30 +03:15 |
| Roxzone | 04:47 | 01:30:24 | 06:57 -02:10 | 01:30:24 |
Amanda Hodges delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Sydney Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 192 and a remarkable rank of 30 in her age group, placing her in the top echelons of competitors. Her completion time of 01:30:24 reflects both her endurance and competitive spirit. However, it is evident from the data that Amanda's pacing strategy may not have been optimal. She started the race at a notably fast pace, with Running 1 being significantly faster than average, which could have contributed to fatigue in later segments. Additionally, her total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating a need for enhanced endurance and running efficiency. Amanda shows a more hybrid profile, with neither running nor strength segments significantly dominating her performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Eland Lynsey | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:40 | |
| Brisbourne Rachel | 2024 Malaga | 01:29:57 | |
| Roig Boixeda Alicia | 2022 Madrid | 01:30:46 | |
| Lehmann Carolin | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:50 | |
| Newnes Becky | 2023 London | 01:30:49 | |
| Morgan Brittani | 2024 Anaheim | 01:30:40 | |
| Wright Nicole | 2023 London | 01:30:42 | |
| Ellis Hayley | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:57 | |
| Torrens Vadell Xisca | 2022 Valencia | 01:30:45 | |
| Hay Annie | 2024 Dallas | 01:30:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne Hodges Amanda, Pillai Yoli | 01:12:44 | |
| 2023 Melbourne Hodges Amanda, Pillai Yoli | 01:16:07 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Hodges Amanda
