Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cox Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cox Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cox Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cox Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:36 | 07:55 to 06:19 | 48.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:01 | 06:15 to 05:14 | 30.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:19 | 05:20 to 05:01 | 9.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:41 to 04:26 | 7.6% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:52 to 04:47 | 2.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:51 to 02:49 | 1.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:23 to 41:23 | 0.0% |
| Cox Thomas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:22 | 00:00 | 04:41 +00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 05:22 | 04:29 +00:12 | 04:41 +00:41 |
| Running 2 | 04:37 | 10:03 | 05:04 -00:27 | 09:10 +00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:51 | 14:40 | 02:59 -00:08 | 14:14 +00:26 |
| Running 3 | 04:47 | 17:31 | 05:32 -00:45 | 17:13 +00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 04:36 | 22:18 | 05:05 -00:29 | 22:45 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:02 | 26:54 | 05:30 -00:28 | 27:50 -00:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:15 | 31:56 | 05:34 +00:41 | 33:20 -01:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 38:11 | 05:41 -00:19 | 38:54 -00:43 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 43:33 | 04:52 +00:00 | 44:35 -01:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:09 | 48:25 | 05:32 -00:23 | 49:27 -01:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 53:34 | 02:13 -00:27 | 54:59 -01:25 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 55:20 | 05:31 -00:17 | 57:12 -01:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:20 | 01:00:34 | 05:18 +00:02 | 01:02:43 -02:09 |
| Running 8 | 05:52 | 01:05:54 | 06:10 -00:18 | 01:08:01 -02:07 |
| Wall Balls | 07:55 | 01:11:46 | 06:45 +01:10 | 01:14:11 -02:25 |
| Roxzone | 08:31 | 01:28:03 | 07:07 +01:24 | 01:28:03 |
Thomas Cox, in the Birmingham HYROX event, demonstrated an impressive performance overall, finishing in the top 37% of all athletes and the top 44% in his age group (30-34). A key highlight of his performance was his total running time, which was faster than average by 02:34. This suggests that Thomas has a running profile and excels more in this aspect. However, it is also important to highlight the need for pacing strategy as his first running segment was slower than average, indicating a potential slow start. As the race progressed, Thomas managed to pick up speed, which is evident in the faster than average splits from running 2 to running 8.
Based on the analysis, here are a few strategies that could be implemented in future races for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cifuentes Julio | 2022 Dallas | 01:28:06 | |
| Fuenmayor Jorman | 2023 Madrid | 01:27:50 | |
| Iberson Paul | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:42 | |
| Klasson Daniel | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:27:58 | |
| Rosenthal A | 2023 Dallas | 01:28:04 | |
| Mergl Wilfried | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:28:26 | |
| Stevens Harry | 2022 London | 01:28:19 | |
| Brady Dean | 2024 Dublin | 01:27:39 | |
| Gregory Samuel | 2021 London | 01:27:35 | |
| Murphy Tony | 2023 Madrid | 01:27:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:32:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
