Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Armstrong Kayleigh's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Armstrong Kayleigh's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Armstrong Kayleigh's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Armstrong Kayleigh's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:19 | 08:48 to 04:29 | 79.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:05 | 06:52 to 05:47 | 19.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:36 to 02:34 | 0.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:09 to 02:08 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:43 to 42:43 | 0.0% |
| Armstrong Kayleigh | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:08 | 00:00 | 05:07 +01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 06:08 | 05:07 -00:16 | 05:07 +01:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 10:59 | 05:29 -00:31 | 10:14 +00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 15:57 | 02:45 -00:09 | 15:43 +00:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 18:33 | 05:47 -00:41 | 18:28 +00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 23:39 | 05:45 -00:53 | 24:15 -00:36 |
| Running 4 | 05:14 | 28:31 | 05:49 -00:35 | 30:00 -01:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:52 | 33:45 | 06:06 +00:46 | 35:49 -02:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:19 | 40:37 | 05:57 -00:38 | 41:55 -01:18 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 45:56 | 05:23 -00:17 | 47:52 -01:56 |
| Running 6 | 05:14 | 51:02 | 05:50 -00:36 | 53:15 -02:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 56:16 | 02:16 -00:07 | 59:05 -02:49 |
| Running 7 | 05:12 | 58:25 | 05:49 -00:37 | 01:01:21 -02:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:11 | 01:03:37 | 04:45 -00:34 | 01:07:10 -03:33 |
| Running 8 | 05:35 | 01:07:48 | 06:13 -00:38 | 01:11:55 -04:07 |
| Wall Balls | 08:48 | 01:13:23 | 04:52 +03:56 | 01:18:08 -04:45 |
| Roxzone | 07:46 | 01:29:51 | 06:51 +00:55 | 01:29:51 |
Kayleigh Armstrong's performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event is impressive. She finished in the top 13% of all athletes and in the top 20% of her age group, an excellent achievement. Her total running time was significantly faster than average, which suggests she has a strong runner profile. In terms of pacing, Kayleigh started slower than average in the first running segment but quickly caught up in subsequent segments. Her strength appears to be in running, which is evident in her consistently faster-than-average running splits.
For future races, Kayleigh should focus on maintaining a steady pace from the start. While she was able to make up time after a slower start, a faster start could improve her overall time. She should also pay attention to her transitions and make sure she rests just enough to catch her breath but not so much that she loses valuable time. Practicing these transitions in training would be beneficial. Considering her running strength, focusing on maintaining her running pace after high-intensity segments could help her capitalize on her strengths.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nicoletti Giada | 2024 Milan | 01:29:50 | |
| Gomez Jessica | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:30:02 | |
| Mellon Claire | 2024 Paris | 01:29:28 | |
| Wincek Klaudia | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:49 | |
| Boulakjar Amal | 2024 Madrid | 01:29:24 | |
| Tellian Jessica | 2021 New York | 01:29:34 | |
| Schüller Katja | 2019 Essen | 01:29:34 | |
| Frederiksen Rie Ravnholdt | 2024 Hamburg | 01:29:29 | |
| Burghardt Sonja | 2018 Essen | 01:29:26 | |
| Taylor Natalie | 2023 Stockholm | 01:29:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
