Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pennacchio Umberto's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pennacchio Umberto's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pennacchio Umberto's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pennacchio Umberto's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:47 | 06:40 to 05:53 | 28.5% |
| Run Total | 00:47 | 41:46 to 40:59 | 28.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:26 | 05:16 to 04:50 | 15.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:23 | 04:54 to 04:31 | 13.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:12 to 02:00 | 7.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:29 to 04:21 | 4.8% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:44 to 04:42 | 1.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Pennacchio Umberto | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:17 | 00:00 | 04:34 +01:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 06:17 | 04:25 +00:04 | 04:34 +01:43 |
| Running 2 | 05:04 | 10:46 | 04:53 +00:11 | 08:59 +01:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 15:50 | 02:52 -00:23 | 13:52 +01:58 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 18:19 | 05:19 +00:08 | 16:44 +01:35 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 23:46 | 04:50 +00:04 | 22:03 +01:43 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 28:40 | 05:17 -00:07 | 26:53 +01:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:16 | 33:50 | 05:11 +00:05 | 32:10 +01:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:15 | 39:06 | 05:28 -00:13 | 37:21 +01:45 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 44:21 | 04:47 -00:03 | 42:49 +01:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:19 | 49:05 | 05:19 +00:00 | 47:36 +01:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 54:24 | 02:08 +00:04 | 52:55 +01:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:00 | 56:36 | 05:18 -00:18 | 55:03 +01:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:36 | 01:01:36 | 04:59 -00:23 | 01:00:21 +01:15 |
| Running 8 | 04:17 | 01:06:12 | 05:53 -01:36 | 01:05:20 +00:52 |
| Wall Balls | 06:40 | 01:10:29 | 06:19 +00:21 | 01:11:13 -00:44 |
| Roxzone | 07:08 | 01:24:10 | 06:38 +00:30 | 01:24:10 |
Umberto Pennacchio delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race, ranking in the top 35% overall and top 40% in his age group. His overall time was 01:24:10, with a total running time of 00:41:46, which was 00:38 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. This suggests that Umberto excels in running but may benefit from additional strength training to improve his performance in more strength-oriented segments. His pacing strategy appeared conservative at the start, evidenced by a slower Running 1 segment, but he gained momentum as the race progressed, finishing with an exceptionally fast Running 8 lap. This indicates the potential for a more aggressive start in future races.
Umberto spent 00:43 longer than average in the Roxzone, suggesting room for improvement in transitions and overall fitness. To enhance transition times, he could practice rapid transitions between exercises in training. Incorporating circuit training with quick transitions between stations can simulate race conditions. Additionally, workouts focused on building cardiovascular endurance will help maintain his pace between exercise zones.
The Wall Balls segment was 00:23 slower than average. Improving this requires focusing on technique and muscular endurance. Umberto should practice proper form, ensuring a full squat and efficient throw. Exercises like thrusters, overhead squats, and medicine ball slams can build the necessary strength and endurance. Additionally, incorporating wall ball-specific interval workouts can enhance his performance under fatigue.
Umberto was 00:11 slower than average. To improve, he should focus on explosive power and agility. Plyometric exercises, such as box jumps and lateral bounds, can enhance his explosive strength. Practicing burpees with a focus on minimizing transition time between the jump and return to the ground will also be beneficial.
This segment was 00:07 slower than average. Improving grip strength and pulling power will be crucial. Exercises like deadlifts, farmer's walks, and resistance band pulls can build the necessary strength. Practicing the sled pull with varying weights can also help adapt to different resistance levels.
Given Umberto's strong finish, he may benefit from adopting a more aggressive start. A negative split strategy, where he starts at a slightly faster pace, could improve his overall time without sacrificing his strong finish.
Improving transition times between segments can significantly impact overall performance. Umberto should practice efficient transitions in training, focusing on quick recovery and preparation for the next segment.
Given his strong running performance, increasing strength training volume could balance his athletic profile. Incorporating compound movements, like squats and deadlifts, with a focus on hypertrophy and endurance will support strength-oriented segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Viney Oliver | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:20 | |
| Hayes Jake | 2023 London | 01:24:27 | |
| Sifuentez Jayson | 2021 Dallas | 01:23:45 | |
| August Elias | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:23:54 | |
| Finlay Daniel | 2024 Dublin | 01:23:42 | |
| Brooks Christopher | 2022 Dallas | 01:24:17 | |
| Olczak Robert | 2024 Gdansk | 01:23:43 | |
| Sullivan Neil | 2024 Madrid | 01:23:43 | |
| Scholz Ruben | 2019 Hamburg | 01:24:32 | |
| Meyer Frank | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:24:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
