Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 627 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:24 (From 01:01:41 to 52:17) | 98.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:06 (From 05:55 to 05:49) | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:58 to 04:58) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:46 to 02:46) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 06:27 to 06:27) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 05:46 to 05:46) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:07 to 05:07) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:33 to 02:33) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 04:54 to 04:54) | 0.0% |
| Largeteau Emmanuelle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:04 | 00:00 | 05:49 +00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:58 | 06:04 | 05:25 -00:27 | 05:49 +00:15 |
| Running 2 | 06:53 | 11:02 | 06:14 +00:39 | 11:14 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 17:55 | 03:11 -00:25 | 17:28 +00:27 |
| Running 3 | 07:32 | 20:41 | 06:37 +00:55 | 20:39 +00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 06:27 | 28:13 | 07:03 -00:36 | 27:16 +00:57 |
| Running 4 | 07:22 | 34:40 | 06:39 +00:43 | 34:19 +00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:46 | 42:02 | 08:04 -02:18 | 40:58 +01:04 |
| Running 5 | 07:27 | 47:48 | 06:53 +00:34 | 49:02 -01:14 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 55:15 | 05:47 -00:40 | 55:55 -00:40 |
| Running 6 | 10:48 | 01:00:22 | 06:46 +04:02 | 01:01:42 -01:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 01:11:10 | 02:36 -00:03 | 01:08:28 +02:42 |
| Running 7 | 07:25 | 01:13:43 | 06:43 +00:42 | 01:11:04 +02:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:55 | 01:21:08 | 06:02 -00:07 | 01:17:47 +03:21 |
| Running 8 | 08:13 | 01:27:03 | 07:33 +00:40 | 01:23:49 +03:14 |
| Wall Balls | 04:54 | 01:35:16 | 06:39 -01:45 | 01:31:22 +03:54 |
| Roxzone | 06:42 | 01:46:45 | 08:44 -02:02 | 01:46:45 |
In terms of pacing, Emmanuelle's overall running time of 01:01:41 was 09:55 slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that she may have taken longer rests or transitions during the race. To improve this segment, Emmanuelle should focus on improving her overall fitness and reducing her transition time. Incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions and practicing quick transitions between exercises can help improve her overall fitness and reduce the time spent in the roxzone.
Segment to Improve:
Based on the splits analysis, the segments with the most time lost for Emmanuelle were Running 6, Running 3, Running 2, Best Lap, Running 4, Running 7, Running 1, Running 5, and Running 8. These segments should be the focus of her training and improvement strategies.
For Running 6, which was 03:56 slower than average, Emmanuelle can benefit from incorporating longer distance runs into her training routine. This will help improve her endurance and speed during longer running segments.
In Running 3, which was 00:50 slower than average, Emmanuelle can focus on interval training to increase her speed and agility. Incorporating sprint intervals and hill repeats into her training routine can help improve her performance in this segment.
In Running 2, which was 00:40 slower than average, Emmanuelle can work on improving her running technique and form. This can be achieved through drills such as high knees, butt kicks, and strides. Additionally, she can incorporate strength training exercises for her lower body, such as squats and lunges, to improve her running power and efficiency.
For Best Lap, which was 00:32 slower than average, Emmanuelle can benefit from practicing shorter, high-intensity runs to improve her speed and pacing. Interval training and tempo runs can be incorporated into her training routine to target this specific segment.
For the remaining running segments (Running 4, Running 7, Running 1, Running 5, and Running 8), Emmanuelle should focus on maintaining a consistent pace and improving her overall endurance. Incorporating long runs, tempo runs, and interval training can help her build the necessary endurance and speed for these segments.
She should also pay attention to her transitions between exercises and aim to minimize the time spent in the roxzone. Practicing quick transitions during training sessions can help her become more efficient in this aspect.
Additionally, Emmanuelle should focus on maintaining good form and technique throughout the race. This includes proper running posture, efficient movement during strength exercises, and effective breathing techniques.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training techniques and exercises, Emmanuelle Largeteau can improve her performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schmitz Simone | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:46:30 | |
| Dewent Shana | 2022 Dallas | 01:47:13 | |
| Gilchrist Angela | 2023 Birmingham | 01:46:24 | |
| Hutt Anneka | 2024 Paris | 01:46:45 | |
| Brush Kimberley | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:46:20 | |
| De Neufville Mira | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:46:19 | |
| Loo Geok Leng | 2023 Singapore | 01:46:53 | |
| Eggers Johanna | 2020 Hannover | 01:46:24 | |
| Verhaar Sungi | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:46:22 | |
| Lenschow Alice | 2018 Hamburg | 01:47:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London Largeteau Emmanuelle | 01:52:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Largeteau Emmanuelle
