Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 723 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Burghardt Anika's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Burghardt Anika's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Burghardt Anika's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Burghardt Anika's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:10 | 53:26 to 51:16 | 71.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:23 | 07:00 to 06:37 | 12.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 05:57 to 05:37 | 11.0% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:48 to 05:40 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:40 to 06:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:57 to 05:57 | 0.0% |
| Burghardt Anika | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:19 | 00:00 | 05:36 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:22 | 05:19 | 05:24 -00:02 | 05:36 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 10:41 | 06:08 -00:45 | 11:00 -00:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 16:04 | 03:06 -00:30 | 17:08 -01:04 |
| Running 3 | 06:14 | 18:40 | 06:33 -00:19 | 20:14 -01:34 |
| Sled Pull | 07:00 | 24:54 | 06:45 +00:15 | 26:47 -01:53 |
| Running 4 | 06:55 | 31:54 | 06:35 +00:20 | 33:32 -01:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:40 | 38:49 | 07:41 -01:01 | 40:07 -01:18 |
| Running 5 | 06:52 | 45:29 | 06:47 +00:05 | 47:48 -02:19 |
| Rowing | 05:48 | 52:21 | 05:42 +00:06 | 54:35 -02:14 |
| Running 6 | 07:46 | 58:09 | 06:41 +01:05 | 01:00:17 -02:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 01:05:55 | 02:33 -00:27 | 01:06:58 -01:03 |
| Running 7 | 06:40 | 01:08:01 | 06:39 +00:01 | 01:09:31 -01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:57 | 01:14:41 | 05:50 +00:07 | 01:16:10 -01:29 |
| Running 8 | 08:21 | 01:20:38 | 07:31 +00:50 | 01:22:00 -01:22 |
| Wall Balls | 05:57 | 01:28:59 | 06:10 -00:13 | 01:29:31 -00:32 |
| Roxzone | 09:27 | 01:44:15 | 08:34 +00:53 | 01:44:15 |
To improve the Run Total segment, Anika should focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time. This can be achieved through specific training techniques such as interval training, hill sprints, and plyometric exercises. Incorporating strength training exercises like squats, lunges, and deadlifts can also help improve running performance.
For the Roxzone segment, Anika should aim to reduce her transition time. This can be achieved through practicing quick and efficient transitions during training sessions. Incorporating agility drills, such as ladder drills and cone drills, can also help improve transition speed.
In the Running 6 and Running 8 segments, Anika should focus on improving her overall running endurance. This can be achieved through longer distance runs at a steady pace, as well as interval training sessions that incorporate both speed and endurance components.
To improve performance in the Running 4 segment, Anika should focus on increasing her speed and agility. This can be achieved through interval training sessions that involve short bursts of high-intensity running, as well as incorporating agility drills such as shuttle runs and lateral movements.
For the Wall Balls and Sandbag Lunges segments, Anika should focus on improving her overall strength and stamina. This can be achieved through strength training exercises such as squats, lunges, and shoulder presses. Incorporating plyometric exercises, such as box jumps and medicine ball throws, can also help improve explosive power and endurance.
Additionally, Anika should focus on efficient transitions between segments to minimize time lost. Practicing quick and smooth transitions during training sessions will help improve overall race performance.
Anika should also consider breaking the race down into smaller, manageable segments mentally. This will help her stay focused and motivated throughout the race, as well as allow her to evaluate her performance and make adjustments as needed.
Overall, Anika has shown strong performance in several segments, particularly in the Running 2 and Sled Push segments, where she performed faster than the average. By targeting the areas of improvement mentioned above and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Anika can further enhance her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brunken Anna | 2023 Hamburg | 01:44:45 | |
| Crane Rachel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:44:43 | |
| Johnson Taryn | 2024 Melbourne | 01:43:50 | |
| Steffen Simone | 2024 Stockholm | 01:44:06 | |
| Kemsley Ellie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:44:40 | |
| Dunne Sophie | 2024 Dublin | 01:43:55 | |
| Zschoch Philippa | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:44:43 | |
| Assady Chenal | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:44:32 | |
| Young Mel | 2023 London | 01:44:22 | |
| Krohn Ulrike | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:44:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Amsterdam | 01:56:56 | |
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:52:09 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
