Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Gdansk using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire SzymańskaKubik Agnieszka's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights SzymańskaKubik Agnieszka's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the SzymańskaKubik Agnieszka's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve SzymańskaKubik Agnieszka's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:30 | 07:03 to 05:33 | 37.2% |
| Sled Push | 01:00 | 03:39 to 02:39 | 24.8% |
| Run Total | 00:29 | 46:31 to 46:02 | 12.0% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:39 to 05:20 | 7.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:25 to 02:11 | 5.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:13 | 06:14 to 06:01 | 5.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 04:54 to 04:43 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 05:11 to 05:05 | 2.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:41 to 03:41 | 0.0% |
| SzymańskaKubik Agnieszka | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:46 | 00:00 | 05:11 +00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:11 | 05:46 | 05:09 +00:02 | 05:11 +00:35 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 10:57 | 05:34 -00:06 | 10:20 +00:37 |
| Sled Push | 03:39 | 16:25 | 02:48 +00:51 | 15:54 +00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 20:04 | 05:52 -00:15 | 18:42 +01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 07:03 | 25:41 | 05:58 +01:05 | 24:34 +01:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 32:44 | 05:54 -00:07 | 30:32 +02:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:14 | 38:31 | 06:19 -00:05 | 36:26 +02:05 |
| Running 5 | 06:01 | 44:45 | 06:04 -00:03 | 42:45 +02:00 |
| Rowing | 05:39 | 50:46 | 05:26 +00:13 | 48:49 +01:57 |
| Running 6 | 05:55 | 56:25 | 05:57 -00:02 | 54:15 +02:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:25 | 01:02:20 | 02:20 +00:05 | 01:00:12 +02:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 01:04:45 | 05:55 +00:03 | 01:02:32 +02:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:54 | 01:10:43 | 04:57 -00:03 | 01:08:27 +02:16 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:15:37 | 06:24 -00:21 | 01:13:24 +02:13 |
| Wall Balls | 03:41 | 01:21:40 | 05:09 -01:28 | 01:19:48 +01:52 |
| Roxzone | 06:55 | 01:32:08 | 07:11 -00:16 | 01:32:08 |
Agnieszka SzymańskaKubik has demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Gdansk HYROX event, securing a top 16% overall rank among 662 athletes and top 17% in her age group. Her total running time was notably 01:01 faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. However, her pacing in the initial running segment was slower, suggesting a cautious start. The performance in strength-focused segments, particularly the Sled Push and Sled Pull, was below average, highlighting a potential area for improvement. Agnieszka's profile leans towards a hybrid athlete, but with a stronger inclination towards running.
In conclusion, while Agnieszka has demonstrated strong running abilities, focusing on improving strength for specific challenges and enhancing transition efficiency can significantly boost her performance in future HYROX events. Tailoring her training to address these areas while maintaining her running prowess will help in achieving a more balanced athlete profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall Lauren | 2022 Manchester | 01:32:31 | |
| Verbunt Tessa | 2022 Maastricht | 01:32:00 | |
| Grewenig Elisabeth | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:32:04 | |
| Wegner Christine | 2019 Hamburg | 01:32:25 | |
| Fulton Laura | 2022 Manchester | 01:32:00 | |
| Mesch Lisa | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:31:50 | |
| Betin Camila | 2023 Milan | 01:32:33 | |
| Masson Skye | 2023 London | 01:31:57 | |
| Hughes Lydia | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:38 | |
| Meier Kristina | 2023 Köln | 01:32:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
