Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Telgen AnneJan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Telgen AnneJan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Telgen AnneJan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Telgen AnneJan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:51 | 45:10 to 41:19 | 73.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:35 | 05:21 to 04:46 | 11.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:32 | 05:27 to 04:55 | 10.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:14 | 06:12 to 05:58 | 4.5% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:44 to 04:43 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:32 to 02:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Telgen AnneJan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 03:36 | 04:25 -00:11 | 04:35 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 07:50 | 04:55 +00:18 | 09:00 -01:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 13:03 | 02:51 -00:19 | 13:55 -00:52 |
| Running 3 | 05:39 | 15:35 | 05:21 +00:18 | 16:46 -01:11 |
| Sled Pull | 03:44 | 21:14 | 04:52 -01:08 | 22:07 -00:53 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 24:58 | 05:20 +00:27 | 26:59 -02:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:27 | 30:45 | 05:14 +00:13 | 32:19 -01:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:55 | 36:12 | 05:30 +00:25 | 37:33 -01:21 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 42:07 | 04:47 -00:03 | 43:03 -00:56 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 46:51 | 05:21 +00:42 | 47:50 -00:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 52:54 | 02:09 -00:33 | 53:11 -00:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:19 | 54:30 | 05:20 +00:59 | 55:20 -00:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:21 | 01:00:49 | 05:02 +00:19 | 01:00:40 +00:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:42 | 01:06:10 | 05:56 +00:46 | 01:05:42 +00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 06:12 | 01:12:52 | 06:25 -00:13 | 01:11:38 +01:14 |
| Roxzone | 05:51 | 01:24:46 | 06:43 -00:52 | 01:24:46 |
AnneJan Telgen delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 32% overall and top 33% within his age group. His overall time was 01:24:46, and his total running time was 00:45:10, which was 02:27 slower than average. This indicates a need to improve running efficiency. His pacing strategy suggests a strong start with a notably fast first running segment, but he progressively slowed down, indicating a potential pacing issue. AnneJan demonstrates a hybrid athlete profile, with strengths in both strength and endurance components, as evidenced by faster-than-average times in several strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| B. Derrick Patrick | 2024 Stockholm | 01:25:00 | |
| Bantin Doc | 2024 Berlin | 01:24:25 | |
| Duke Daniel | 2024 London | 01:24:16 | |
| Serpelloni Maxime | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:24:41 | |
| Martin Stephen | 2023 Glasgow | 01:24:45 | |
| Khatib Jan Victor | 2024 Köln | 01:24:44 | |
| Livingston Davon | 2019 New York | 01:24:21 | |
| Dez Haruta Ismael | 2023 Madrid | 01:24:21 | |
| Alvarez Solórzano Noél Eduardo | 2024 Mexico City | 01:25:05 | |
| Smet Nicolas | 2024 Marseille | 01:24:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
