Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hale Mitchell's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hale Mitchell's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hale Mitchell's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hale Mitchell's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:30 | 06:28 to 04:58 | 32.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:22 | 05:58 to 04:36 | 29.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:43 | 05:31 to 04:48 | 15.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:40 | 05:02 to 04:22 | 14.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:19 | 06:20 to 06:01 | 6.8% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:50 to 04:43 | 2.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:38 to 40:38 | 0.0% |
| Hale Mitchell | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:48 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:02 | 03:48 | 04:26 +00:36 | 04:35 -00:47 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 08:50 | 04:55 +00:00 | 09:01 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 13:45 | 02:51 -00:13 | 13:56 -00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:12 | 16:23 | 05:22 -00:10 | 16:47 -00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 05:58 | 21:35 | 04:53 +01:05 | 22:09 -00:34 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 27:33 | 05:20 +00:00 | 27:02 +00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:28 | 32:53 | 05:17 +01:11 | 32:22 +00:31 |
| Running 5 | 05:19 | 39:21 | 05:31 -00:12 | 37:39 +01:42 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 44:40 | 04:48 +00:02 | 43:10 +01:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 49:30 | 05:22 -00:19 | 47:58 +01:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 54:33 | 02:10 -00:24 | 53:20 +01:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:01 | 56:19 | 05:21 -00:20 | 55:30 +00:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:31 | 01:01:20 | 05:03 +00:28 | 01:00:51 +00:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:06:51 | 05:57 +00:06 | 01:05:54 +00:57 |
| Wall Balls | 06:20 | 01:12:54 | 06:27 -00:07 | 01:11:51 +01:03 |
| Roxzone | 05:56 | 01:25:03 | 06:45 -00:49 | 01:25:03 |
Mitchell Hale delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Sydney Hyrox event, ranking 402 overall and placing in the top 37% of the 1059 participants. In his age group (40-44), he ranked 56th, positioning him in the top 36% among 153 athletes. His overall time was an impressive 01:25:03. Notably, Mitchell's total running time was 00:40:38, which was 02:09 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. His best running lap was clocked at 00:04:55. However, Mitchell's pacing strategy suggests he started strong, particularly excelling in the initial running segments, which may have led to fatigue affecting his performance in subsequent strength-focused exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debenham Sam | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:24 | |
| Atamu Danny | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:24:37 | |
| Green Ted | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:40 | |
| Taferner Jonas | 2024 Hamburg | 01:25:25 | |
| Fonda Chris | 2023 Melbourne | 01:24:40 | |
| Hofer Jürgen | 2018 Wien | 01:25:00 | |
| Thom Owen | 2022 Birmingham | 01:25:05 | |
| Schunack Martin | 2019 Hannover | 01:24:41 | |
| Hermeneit Reinhard | 2022 Bremen | 01:24:56 | |
| Bilionis George | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Brisbane | 01:23:16 | |
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
