Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 453 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cresp Stephen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cresp Stephen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cresp Stephen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cresp Stephen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:19 | 11:30 to 07:11 | 55.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:02 | 10:51 to 07:49 | 38.6% |
| Rowing | 00:30 | 05:55 to 05:25 | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:09 to 06:09 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:52 to 02:52 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:50 to 08:50 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 53:04 to 53:04 | 0.0% |
| Cresp Stephen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:45 | 00:00 | 05:35 +00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 05:45 | 04:53 -00:01 | 05:35 +00:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:38 | 10:37 | 06:15 -00:37 | 10:28 +00:09 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 16:15 | 04:01 -01:36 | 16:43 -00:28 |
| Running 3 | 06:21 | 18:40 | 06:58 -00:37 | 20:44 -02:04 |
| Sled Pull | 06:09 | 25:01 | 06:56 -00:47 | 27:42 -02:41 |
| Running 4 | 06:45 | 31:10 | 06:59 -00:14 | 34:38 -03:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:51 | 37:55 | 08:08 +02:43 | 41:37 -03:42 |
| Running 5 | 06:52 | 48:46 | 07:21 -00:29 | 49:45 -00:59 |
| Rowing | 05:55 | 55:38 | 05:28 +00:27 | 57:06 -01:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:35 | 01:01:33 | 07:08 -00:33 | 01:02:34 -01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:52 | 01:08:08 | 02:51 +00:01 | 01:09:42 -01:34 |
| Running 7 | 07:01 | 01:11:00 | 07:05 -00:04 | 01:12:33 -01:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 11:30 | 01:18:01 | 07:28 +04:02 | 01:19:38 -01:37 |
| Running 8 | 08:11 | 01:29:31 | 08:59 -00:48 | 01:27:06 +02:25 |
| Wall Balls | 08:50 | 01:37:42 | 09:41 -00:51 | 01:36:05 +01:37 |
| Roxzone | 10:00 | 01:56:24 | 10:38 -00:38 | 01:56:24 |
Stephen Cresp demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX race. His total running time was a significant 3 minutes and 50 seconds faster than the average, suggesting a strong running profile. This indicates that Stephen excels in endurance and speed across the running segments, showcasing his athleticism in maintaining a consistent pace. However, his pacing strategy appears to have been well-balanced, as he did not start too aggressively in the initial phases of the race, aligning closely with the average pace.
Despite his strong running abilities, there are clear indications that his strength segments, particularly those involving complex movements after running, could benefit from targeted improvements to enhance his overall performance.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and implementing strategic training and race strategies, Stephen Cresp can enhance his overall performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Heatley Pete | 2024 Sydney | 01:56:27 | |
| Francisco Celso Jr | 2023 Singapore | 01:56:19 | |
| Hwang Kwangho | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:56:07 | |
| Sweetman Guy | 2023 Birmingham | 01:56:02 | |
| Rapp David | 2024 London | 01:56:21 | |
| Sarvide Vilchis Fernando | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:56:19 | |
| Ramanathan Narendran | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:55:54 | |
| Barrett Steve | 2023 London | 01:56:44 | |
| Shoebridge Ed | 2024 Birmingham | 01:56:52 | |
| Lim Yi Shin | 2024 Singapore | 01:56:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
