Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Warschau using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Janicki Michał's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Janicki Michał's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Janicki Michał's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Janicki Michał's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:44 | 41:00 to 37:16 | 57.1% |
| Sled Pull | 01:12 | 05:06 to 03:54 | 18.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:51 | 02:36 to 01:45 | 13.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:45 | 03:00 to 02:15 | 11.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:42 to 03:42 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Janicki Michał | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:55 | 00:00 | 04:14 -00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:01 | 03:55 | 04:18 -00:17 | 04:14 -00:19 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 07:56 | 04:33 +00:24 | 08:32 -00:36 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 12:53 | 02:37 +00:23 | 13:05 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 15:53 | 04:54 +00:36 | 15:42 +00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 05:06 | 21:23 | 04:21 +00:45 | 20:36 +00:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 26:29 | 04:53 +00:43 | 24:57 +01:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:42 | 32:05 | 04:32 -00:50 | 29:50 +02:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 35:47 | 04:59 +00:37 | 34:22 +01:25 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 41:23 | 04:36 -00:07 | 39:21 +02:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 45:52 | 04:54 +00:55 | 43:57 +01:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 51:41 | 01:58 +00:38 | 48:51 +02:50 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 54:17 | 04:52 +00:30 | 50:49 +03:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:43 | 59:39 | 04:27 -00:44 | 55:41 +03:58 |
| Running 8 | 04:17 | 01:03:22 | 05:17 -01:00 | 01:00:08 +03:14 |
| Wall Balls | 04:50 | 01:07:39 | 05:38 -00:48 | 01:05:25 +02:14 |
| Roxzone | 04:21 | 01:16:44 | 05:41 -01:20 | 01:16:44 |
Based on the splits analysis, Michał had some areas of strength and areas that need improvement. His best running lap was 00:03:55, which was 00:10 faster than the average. He also performed well in the Ski Erg and Burpees Broad Jump segments, where he was faster than the average by 00:13 and 00:32, respectively.
However, Michał struggled in several running segments, specifically Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, and Running 7. In these segments, he was consistently slower than the average, with time differences ranging from 00:25 to 00:56 slower. The segments where he lost the most time were Running 6, Running 4, Running 5, Running 3, and Running 7.
In conclusion, Michał Janicki had a strong performance in the 2023 Warschau HYROX race. While he demonstrated strengths in certain segments, he should focus on improving his running performance to enhance his overall race results. By incorporating specific training strategies, drills, and techniques, Michał can build his running endurance, speed, and technique, ultimately leading to improved performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Safner Darko | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:16:33 | |
| Maguire Callum | 2023 Birmingham | 01:16:40 | |
| Clovirola Alexandre | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:16:42 | |
| Pircher Armin | 2023 Hannover | 01:16:50 | |
| Bisschop Robin | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:16:18 | |
| Walsh Joseph | 2024 Birmingham | 01:16:34 | |
| Komarek Joscha | 2023 Hamburg | 01:17:02 | |
| Böhm Noah | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:17:11 | |
| Dijkstra Kjeld | 2024 Maastricht | 01:16:34 | |
| Möbius Tino | 2022 Bremen | 01:16:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
