Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Falder Cameron's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Falder Cameron's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Falder Cameron's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Falder Cameron's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:36 | 06:38 to 05:02 | 39.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:55 | 06:10 to 05:15 | 22.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:54 | 07:33 to 06:39 | 22.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:30 to 02:12 | 7.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:13 | 03:10 to 02:57 | 5.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 05:42 to 05:32 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:08 to 40:08 | 0.0% |
| Falder Cameron | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 04:29 | 04:31 -00:16 | 04:46 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 06:13 | 08:44 | 05:11 +01:02 | 09:17 -00:33 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 14:57 | 03:04 +00:06 | 14:28 +00:29 |
| Running 3 | 04:26 | 18:07 | 05:40 -01:14 | 17:32 +00:35 |
| Sled Pull | 06:38 | 22:33 | 05:17 +01:21 | 23:12 -00:39 |
| Running 4 | 04:26 | 29:11 | 05:38 -01:12 | 28:29 +00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:42 | 33:37 | 05:49 -00:07 | 34:07 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 04:34 | 39:19 | 05:51 -01:17 | 39:56 -00:37 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 43:53 | 04:56 -00:06 | 45:47 -01:54 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 48:43 | 05:41 -00:43 | 50:43 -02:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 53:41 | 02:18 +00:12 | 56:24 -02:43 |
| Running 7 | 04:52 | 56:11 | 05:39 -00:47 | 58:42 -02:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:10 | 01:01:03 | 05:30 +00:40 | 01:04:21 -03:18 |
| Running 8 | 06:13 | 01:07:13 | 06:23 -00:10 | 01:09:51 -02:38 |
| Wall Balls | 07:33 | 01:13:26 | 07:05 +00:28 | 01:16:14 -02:48 |
| Roxzone | 09:56 | 01:30:49 | 07:30 +02:26 | 01:30:49 |
Cameron Falder has put in a commendable performance at the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. His total running time, which is 04:56 faster than average, places him solidly in the runner profile. This indicates a strong running base that has contributed significantly to his overall performance. He started the race with a solid pace, as evidenced by his faster than average time in Running 1. However, Cameron seems to have struggled with maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race, as seen in the slower times in Running 2, Sled Pull, and the Roxzone.
In order to improve his race performance, Cameron should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sampson Ronnie | 2024 Dallas | 01:31:03 | |
| Simpson Scott | 2023 Sydney | 01:31:15 | |
| Lameau Sebastien | 2023 Köln | 01:30:31 | |
| Bickford Dan | 2024 London | 01:31:18 | |
| Troppmann Roman | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:30:29 | |
| Fox Holden | 2021 Austin | 01:31:16 | |
| Florent Tarroux | 2024 Marseille | 01:30:25 | |
| Smith Iwan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:30:43 | |
| Johnston Rhys | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:11 | |
| Hommers Ed | 2022 Birmingham | 01:31:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
