Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:53 (From 42:50 to 39:57) | 69.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:31 (From 04:52 to 04:21) | 12.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 (From 02:17 to 01:56) | 8.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 (From 04:47 to 04:31) | 6.4% |
| BBJ | 00:09 (From 04:46 to 04:37) | 3.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:17 to 04:17) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 01:55 to 01:55) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:33 to 04:33) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 04:21 to 04:21) | 0.0% |
| Devic Nem | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:54 | 00:00 | 04:30 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 04:54 | 04:23 -00:06 | 04:30 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 05:03 | 09:11 | 04:47 +00:16 | 08:53 +00:18 |
| Sled Push | 01:55 | 14:14 | 02:46 -00:51 | 13:40 +00:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 16:09 | 05:12 -00:11 | 16:26 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 21:10 | 04:41 +00:11 | 21:38 -00:28 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 26:02 | 05:09 +00:07 | 26:19 -00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:46 | 31:18 | 04:59 -00:13 | 31:28 -00:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 36:04 | 05:19 +00:14 | 36:27 -00:23 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 41:37 | 04:44 -00:11 | 41:46 -00:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:38 | 46:10 | 05:12 +00:26 | 46:30 -00:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 51:48 | 02:06 +00:11 | 51:42 +00:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 54:05 | 05:10 +00:10 | 53:48 +00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:47 | 59:25 | 04:51 -00:04 | 58:58 +00:27 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:04:12 | 05:42 +00:27 | 01:03:49 +00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 04:21 | 01:10:21 | 06:08 -01:47 | 01:09:31 +00:50 |
| Roxzone | 07:27 | 01:21:59 | 06:20 +01:07 | 01:21:59 |
Nem Devic delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking 419th overall and 67th in his age group, placing him in the top quartile of both categories. His overall time was 01:21:59, showcasing a solid foundation in both running and strength segments. However, analysis indicates that Nem's total running time of 42:50 was 01:26 slower than the average, suggesting room for improvement in his running endurance. His best running lap was 00:05:01, indicating potential for better pace management. While Nem demonstrated strong prowess in strength exercises, particularly in the Sled Push and Wall Balls, his performance suggests a hybrid profile with a slight edge toward strength. Additionally, his pacing was consistent in the early running segments, yet slowed down progressively, indicating a need for maintaining pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Noyen Fred | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:22:13 | |
| Samowitz Gary | 2023 Melbourne | 01:22:12 | |
| Legum Judd | 2023 New York | 01:21:35 | |
| Augusto JeanPhilippe | 2024 Paris | 01:22:19 | |
| Wood Nick | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:00 | |
| Geister Joscha | 2023 Hamburg | 01:21:49 | |
| Klein Norbert | 2023 Köln | 01:21:43 | |
| Timmermans Joep | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:21:51 | |
| Mccullough Michael | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:21:48 | |
| Morphett Edward | 2024 London | 01:22:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne Devic Nem | 01:27:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Devic Nem
