Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stutzkowski Frank's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stutzkowski Frank's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stutzkowski Frank's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stutzkowski Frank's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:12 | 07:10 to 04:58 | 41.3% |
| Run Total | 01:55 | 43:24 to 41:29 | 35.9% |
| Wall Balls | 01:09 | 07:10 to 06:01 | 21.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:25 to 04:22 | 0.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:01 | 04:49 to 04:48 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Stutzkowski Frank | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:31 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:31 | 04:26 -00:01 | 04:35 +00:56 |
| Running 2 | 03:17 | 09:56 | 04:56 -01:39 | 09:01 +00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 13:13 | 02:52 -00:41 | 13:57 -00:44 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 15:24 | 05:23 +00:10 | 16:49 -01:25 |
| Sled Pull | 04:11 | 20:57 | 04:53 -00:42 | 22:12 -01:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 25:08 | 05:21 +00:06 | 27:05 -01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:10 | 30:35 | 05:17 +01:53 | 32:26 -01:51 |
| Running 5 | 05:49 | 37:45 | 05:31 +00:18 | 37:43 +00:02 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 43:34 | 04:48 -00:12 | 43:14 +00:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:41 | 48:10 | 05:22 +00:19 | 48:02 +00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 53:51 | 02:10 -00:19 | 53:24 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 55:42 | 05:22 +00:15 | 55:34 +00:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:49 | 01:01:19 | 05:04 -00:15 | 01:00:56 +00:23 |
| Running 8 | 06:31 | 01:06:08 | 05:57 +00:34 | 01:06:00 +00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 07:10 | 01:12:39 | 06:28 +00:42 | 01:11:57 +00:42 |
| Roxzone | 05:23 | 01:25:12 | 06:47 -01:24 | 01:25:12 |
Based on the splits analysis, Frank's strongest segments were Running 2, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, and Sandbag Lunges, where he performed faster than the average. This indicates that Frank has good strength and endurance capabilities in these particular exercises.
However, Frank struggled in segments such as Burpees Broad Jump, Running 1, Wall Balls, Running 8, Running 6, Running 5, and Running 7, where he lost significant time compared to the average. These segments require a combination of strength, endurance, and agility, suggesting areas where Frank can focus on improving his performance.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on specific areas of improvement, Frank can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. Regular practice, consistency, and a well-rounded training plan will contribute to his success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Franchetti Erik | 2024 Milan | 01:25:33 | |
| Castilla Montes Antonio | 2022 Madrid | 01:25:15 | |
| Wang Tzuchung Steven | 2022 Dallas | 01:24:47 | |
| Rikkert Johan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:00 | |
| Pfeiffer Florian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:25:20 | |
| Soto Muñoz Jose | 2024 Malaga | 01:25:10 | |
| Green Brian | 2021 New York | 01:25:33 | |
| Volpe Anthony | 2023 New York | 01:24:42 | |
| Blackman Adrian | 2024 Malaga | 01:25:31 | |
| Turbitt Niall | 2024 London | 01:25:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Leipzig | 01:18:39 | |
| 2018 Leipzig | 01:28:04 | |
| 2021 Leipzig | 01:28:49 | |
| 2019 Hamburg | 01:31:32 | |
| 2021 Hamburg | 01:28:20 | |
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:37:45 | |
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:55:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
