Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 592 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gilpin Chris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gilpin Chris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gilpin Chris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gilpin Chris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 16:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 16:49 | 01:09:52 to 53:03 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:50 to 05:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Gilpin Chris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 05:36 -01:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 03:58 | 04:51 -00:44 | 05:36 -01:38 |
| Running 2 | 06:40 | 08:05 | 06:13 +00:27 | 10:27 -02:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 14:45 | 03:49 -01:29 | 16:40 -01:55 |
| Running 3 | 08:36 | 17:05 | 07:00 +01:36 | 20:29 -03:24 |
| Sled Pull | 05:10 | 25:41 | 06:45 -01:35 | 27:29 -01:48 |
| Running 4 | 08:15 | 30:51 | 06:55 +01:20 | 34:14 -03:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:24 | 39:06 | 07:51 -02:27 | 41:09 -02:03 |
| Running 5 | 10:36 | 44:30 | 07:17 +03:19 | 49:00 -04:30 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 55:06 | 05:24 -00:31 | 56:17 -01:11 |
| Running 6 | 09:43 | 59:59 | 06:57 +02:46 | 01:01:41 -01:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:50 | 01:09:42 | 02:51 -00:01 | 01:08:38 +01:04 |
| Running 7 | 09:21 | 01:12:32 | 07:00 +02:21 | 01:11:29 +01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:50 | 01:21:53 | 07:21 -01:31 | 01:18:29 +03:24 |
| Running 8 | 12:47 | 01:27:43 | 08:37 +04:10 | 01:25:50 +01:53 |
| Wall Balls | 04:17 | 01:40:30 | 09:35 -05:18 | 01:34:27 +06:03 |
| Roxzone | 09:43 | 01:54:22 | 10:20 -00:37 | 01:54:22 |
Chris's total running time was 01:09:52, which was 17:02 slower than the average. This suggests that he should focus on improving his overall fitness and his transition time during the race. Additionally, his total running time was slower than average, indicating that he should prioritize training his running abilities.
In conclusion, Chris Gilpin showed strength in certain segments of the HYROX race, but there are areas that need improvement, particularly in the running segments and the Roxzone. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, pacing strategies, and mental preparation, Chris can enhance his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mc Neill Ian | 2024 Madrid | 01:54:10 | |
| Sidaway Adam | 2022 Birmingham | 01:54:04 | |
| Heil Christopher | 2021 New York | 01:54:32 | |
| Plum Matthias | 2024 Köln | 01:54:05 | |
| Gruber Ethan | 2023 New York | 01:54:07 | |
| Cheng Jimmy | 2024 Incheon | 01:54:40 | |
| Bauer Michal | 2024 Katowice | 01:54:21 | |
| Law Ronald | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:54:37 | |
| Jalowietzki Oliver | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:54:47 | |
| Lozano Vargas Dick | 2021 Madrid | 01:54:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Brisbane | 01:29:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
