Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Lafontaineclarke Robert's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Lafontaineclarke Robert's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Lafontaineclarke Robert's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Lafontaineclarke Robert's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:39 | 42:21 to 38:42 | 61.9% |
| Wall Balls | 01:02 | 06:21 to 05:19 | 17.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:59 | 05:19 to 04:20 | 16.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:00 to 01:51 | 2.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 04:23 to 04:18 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:39 to 03:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| De Lafontaineclarke Robert | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:40 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 03:40 | 04:20 -00:07 | 04:20 -00:40 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 07:53 | 04:41 +00:16 | 08:40 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:09 | 12:50 | 02:41 -00:32 | 13:21 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:20 | 14:59 | 05:04 +00:16 | 16:02 -01:03 |
| Sled Pull | 03:39 | 20:19 | 04:29 -00:50 | 21:06 -00:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 23:58 | 05:03 +00:28 | 25:35 -01:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 29:29 | 04:46 +00:33 | 30:38 -01:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:04 | 34:48 | 05:12 +00:52 | 35:24 -00:36 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 40:52 | 04:40 -00:14 | 40:36 +00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:32 | 45:18 | 05:04 +00:28 | 45:16 +00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 50:50 | 02:01 -00:01 | 50:20 +00:30 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 52:50 | 05:03 +00:28 | 52:21 +00:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:23 | 58:21 | 04:38 -00:15 | 57:24 +00:57 |
| Running 8 | 05:49 | 01:02:44 | 05:31 +00:18 | 01:02:02 +00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 06:21 | 01:08:33 | 05:51 +00:30 | 01:07:33 +01:00 |
| Roxzone | 04:39 | 01:19:27 | 06:03 -01:24 | 01:19:27 |
Pacing and Profile:
Robert's total running time of 00:42:21 is 03:43 slower than the average time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to increase his speed during the race. Additionally, his best running lap of 00:03:40 suggests that he has a strong running profile and should continue to train his strength to maintain this advantage.
In summary, Robert De Lafontaineclarke had a strong performance in the Hyrox race. To further enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, targeting specific areas for improvement, such as running endurance, explosive power, and upper body strength, will help him excel in the identified segments. Implementing race strategies focused on efficient transitions, pacing, technique, and mental preparation will further contribute to his overall success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thibault Florent | 2024 Marseille | 01:19:24 | |
| Wright Anthony | 2023 Glasgow | 01:19:25 | |
| Bardell George | 2022 Manchester | 01:19:49 | |
| Bayssat Theo | 2024 Marseille | 01:19:16 | |
| Moll Maurice | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:19:42 | |
| Schrod Sebastian | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:19:44 | |
| Richardson John | 2024 Sydney | 01:19:17 | |
| Boden Matthew | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:19:57 | |
| Elder Anthony | 2024 Perth | 01:19:51 | |
| Van Zutphen Shane | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:19:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
