Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schreiber Markus's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schreiber Markus's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schreiber Markus's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schreiber Markus's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:37 | 50:06 to 47:29 | 34.8% |
| Sled Pull | 02:32 | 08:13 to 05:41 | 33.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:58 | 04:18 to 03:20 | 12.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:54 | 03:22 to 02:28 | 12.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:30 | 05:09 to 04:39 | 6.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:56 to 06:56 | 0.0% |
| Schreiber Markus | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 05:03 -00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:09 | 04:15 | 04:38 +00:31 | 05:03 -00:48 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 09:24 | 05:32 -00:25 | 09:41 -00:17 |
| Sled Push | 04:18 | 14:31 | 03:21 +00:57 | 15:13 -00:42 |
| Running 3 | 06:30 | 18:49 | 06:06 +00:24 | 18:34 +00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 08:13 | 25:19 | 05:48 +02:25 | 24:40 +00:39 |
| Running 4 | 06:22 | 33:32 | 06:03 +00:19 | 30:28 +03:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:43 | 39:54 | 06:36 -01:53 | 36:31 +03:23 |
| Running 5 | 06:35 | 44:37 | 06:19 +00:16 | 43:07 +01:30 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 51:12 | 05:06 -00:04 | 49:26 +01:46 |
| Running 6 | 06:09 | 56:14 | 06:07 +00:02 | 54:32 +01:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:22 | 01:02:23 | 02:31 +00:51 | 01:00:39 +01:44 |
| Running 7 | 06:27 | 01:05:45 | 06:07 +00:20 | 01:03:10 +02:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:53 | 01:12:12 | 06:11 -01:18 | 01:09:17 +02:55 |
| Running 8 | 08:45 | 01:17:05 | 07:06 +01:39 | 01:15:28 +01:37 |
| Wall Balls | 06:56 | 01:25:50 | 07:54 -00:58 | 01:22:34 +03:16 |
| Roxzone | 06:19 | 01:38:56 | 08:28 -02:09 | 01:38:56 |
His overall time of 01:38:56 was respectable, but there are areas where he can improve his performance. His total running time of 00:50:06 was 04:15 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition times. However, his best running lap time of 00:04:15 was 00:35 faster than the average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in running if he trains specifically for it.
Overall, Markus Schreiber has shown potential in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve his performance. By focusing on his overall fitness, specific training for running and strength, and implementing efficient race strategies, he can enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chng Melvin | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:39:05 | |
| Dunning Shane | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:38:54 | |
| Schmitt Matt | 2024 Dallas | 01:38:32 | |
| Robinson Callum | 2024 Dublin | 01:39:20 | |
| Quezada González Lenin | 2024 Madrid | 01:39:06 | |
| Simko Zack | 2022 New York | 01:38:56 | |
| Tang Alex | 2024 Birmingham | 01:39:22 | |
| Hampshire Ben | 2024 Manchester | 01:39:09 | |
| Brock Dale | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:39:03 | |
| Darre Adrien | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:39:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
