Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hufnagel Ansgar's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hufnagel Ansgar's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hufnagel Ansgar's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hufnagel Ansgar's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:58 | 48:03 to 46:05 | 59.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:45 | 06:25 to 05:40 | 22.8% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:16 to 04:59 | 8.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 05:36 to 05:26 | 5.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:41 to 04:35 | 3.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:23 to 02:22 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:32 to 02:32 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:03 to 06:03 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:15 to 07:15 | 0.0% |
| Hufnagel Ansgar | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 04:45 | 04:36 +00:05 | 04:58 -00:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 09:26 | 05:24 -00:06 | 09:34 -00:08 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 14:44 | 03:14 -00:42 | 14:58 -00:14 |
| Running 3 | 06:21 | 17:16 | 05:54 +00:27 | 18:12 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 05:36 | 23:37 | 05:38 -00:02 | 24:06 -00:29 |
| Running 4 | 06:09 | 29:13 | 05:54 +00:15 | 29:44 -00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:03 | 35:22 | 06:19 -00:16 | 35:38 -00:16 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 41:25 | 06:08 -00:03 | 41:57 -00:32 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 47:30 | 05:03 +00:13 | 48:05 -00:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 52:46 | 05:56 +00:07 | 53:08 -00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 58:49 | 02:27 -00:04 | 59:04 -00:15 |
| Running 7 | 06:01 | 01:01:12 | 05:56 +00:05 | 01:01:31 -00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:25 | 01:07:13 | 05:54 +00:31 | 01:07:27 -00:14 |
| Running 8 | 07:23 | 01:13:38 | 06:49 +00:34 | 01:13:21 +00:17 |
| Wall Balls | 07:15 | 01:21:01 | 07:40 -00:25 | 01:20:10 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 07:53 | 01:36:03 | 08:13 -00:20 | 01:36:03 |
Based on the provided splits, Ansgar's best running lap was 00:04:45. His running performance was on par with the average time, indicating that he has a balanced running profile. However, there is room for improvement in certain segments, as discussed below.
In conclusion, Ansgar Hufnagel had a commendable performance in the 2023 Stuttgart Hyrox race. While he demonstrated strength in certain segments, there are areas that require improvement. By implementing the suggested training strategies, techniques, and race strategies, Ansgar can enhance his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynch Rory | 2024 Manchester | 01:36:32 | |
| Skelly Sean | 2024 Melbourne | 01:35:35 | |
| Nelson Skylar | 2023 Anaheim | 01:36:11 | |
| Barthoulot Florian | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:36:15 | |
| Williams Liam | 2023 Manchester | 01:35:59 | |
| Mears Luke | 2022 Manchester | 01:36:31 | |
| Tudor Charles | 2024 London | 01:36:28 | |
| Lim Tony | 2024 Melbourne | 01:36:10 | |
| Kwasniak Pawel | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:36:15 | |
| Mcdaid Liam | 2023 Glasgow | 01:36:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:28:34 | |
| 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:41:54 | |
| 2021 Stuttgart | 01:57:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
