Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 650 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcgowan Brian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcgowan Brian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcgowan Brian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcgowan Brian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 12:47 | 01:05:18 to 52:31 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:05 to 07:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:08 to 06:08 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:14 to 06:14 | 0.0% |
| Mcgowan Brian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:13 | 00:00 | 05:31 -01:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 04:13 | 04:49 -00:17 | 05:31 -01:18 |
| Running 2 | 08:56 | 08:45 | 06:06 +02:50 | 10:20 -01:35 |
| Sled Push | 03:35 | 17:41 | 03:48 -00:13 | 16:26 +01:15 |
| Running 3 | 09:42 | 21:16 | 06:51 +02:51 | 20:14 +01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 05:06 | 30:58 | 06:37 -01:31 | 27:05 +03:53 |
| Running 4 | 09:48 | 36:04 | 06:47 +03:01 | 33:42 +02:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:05 | 45:52 | 07:44 -00:39 | 40:29 +05:23 |
| Running 5 | 09:40 | 52:57 | 07:11 +02:29 | 48:13 +04:44 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 01:02:37 | 05:23 -00:19 | 55:24 +07:13 |
| Running 6 | 09:16 | 01:07:41 | 06:53 +02:23 | 01:00:47 +06:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 01:16:57 | 02:46 -00:28 | 01:07:40 +09:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:16 | 01:19:15 | 06:57 -00:41 | 01:10:26 +08:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:08 | 01:25:31 | 07:16 -01:08 | 01:17:23 +08:08 |
| Running 8 | 07:31 | 01:31:39 | 08:33 -01:02 | 01:24:39 +07:00 |
| Wall Balls | 06:14 | 01:39:10 | 09:20 -03:06 | 01:33:12 +05:58 |
| Roxzone | 07:34 | 01:52:49 | 10:17 -02:43 | 01:52:49 |
Brian Mcgowan demonstrated commendable effort in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking within the top 65% of the overall competitors and 66% in his age group. Key strengths were evident in his strong performance across several strength-based exercises such as the Sled Pull and Sandbag Lunges, where he achieved percentile ranks of 14 and 20, respectively. His running times, however, were notably slower, with a total running time of 01:05:18, which is 09:53 slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in running endurance. His performance shows a bias towards strength over running, suggesting a hybrid-athlete profile. Additionally, Brian's initial running segment was significantly faster than average, but subsequent segments were slower, indicating that he may have started too fast and fatigued quickly.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Berkhout Joris | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:52:20 | |
| Olivas Fernando | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:52:47 | |
| Niven Callum | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:52:30 | |
| Carrillo Victor | 2024 Anaheim | 01:53:06 | |
| Klebs Frank | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:52:35 | |
| Rice Ciaran | 2023 Dallas | 01:52:34 | |
| Pink Ryan | 2022 London | 01:53:15 | |
| Jacobs Logan | 2024 Cape Town | 01:52:19 | |
| Zalewski Sylwester | 2024 Milan | 01:52:57 | |
| Sewell Robert | 2024 Manchester | 01:52:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
