Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Leemans Jan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Leemans Jan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Leemans Jan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Leemans Jan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
02:06.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Jan Leemans exhibited a commendable performance in the 2024 Hamburg HYROX event. His overall rank sits in the top 77% of all athletes and in the top 82% of his age group (16-24). His total running time was notably strong, being 02:12 faster than the average. This suggests that Jan has a more runner-centric profile and is relatively more proficient in running segments. His best lap was also a running lap, reinforcing his running strength. However, the roxzone time was significantly slower than average, indicating more rest or transition time was taken. This suggests an area for potential improvement in overall fitness and transition efficiency.
Segments to Improve
Roxzone: Jan's roxzone time was slower than average by almost two minutes, indicating more rest or transition time taken. To improve this, he could work on enhancing his recovery rate and transition efficiency. High-intensity interval training might be beneficial, alternating between periods of intense exercise and recovery. Specific exercises like burpees can also help boost overall fitness and transition speed.
Wall Balls: Jan's performance was slower than average in the Wall Balls segment. To improve this, he should focus on strength training, particularly targeting the legs, arms, and core. Squats, lunges, and kettlebell swings could help enhance strength and endurance in these areas.
Burpees Broad Jump: Jan's performance in the Burpees Broad Jump segment was slower than average, indicating a potential lack of explosive power. Incorporating plyometric exercises, such as box jumps and power skips, could help improve this.
Sandbag Lunges: Jan was slower than average in the Sandbag Lunges segment. To improve this, he could enhance his leg strength and balance through exercises like weighted lunges and squats.
Farmers Carry: This segment was also slower than average for Jan. Strengthening the grip, arms, and core might help in this segment. Exercises like dumbbell farmers walk or kettlebell carries could be beneficial.
Race Strategies
Jan should consider employing the following strategies during the race for better performance:
Pacing: Given his strong performance in running segments, Jan should maintain a steady pace throughout these segments to conserve energy for the strength segments.
Transition Efficiency: Improving transition time can significantly enhance overall performance. Practicing quick transitions between exercises during training can help achieve this.
Strength Training: Given his runner profile, additional focus on strength training can help balance his performance across running and strength segments and enhance his overall rank.