Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 763 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Green Joe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Green Joe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Green Joe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Green Joe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:22 | 11:44 to 07:22 | 36.3% |
| Wall Balls | 02:19 | 11:15 to 08:56 | 19.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:13 | 09:00 to 06:47 | 18.4% |
| Sled Push | 01:07 | 04:55 to 03:48 | 9.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:59 | 07:27 to 06:28 | 8.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:33 | 03:20 to 02:47 | 4.6% |
| Rowing | 00:21 | 05:40 to 05:19 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:57 to 04:50 | 1.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:45 to 41:45 | 0.0% |
| Green Joe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:20 | 00:00 | 05:24 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:57 | 05:20 | 04:47 +00:10 | 05:24 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 10:17 | 06:01 -01:03 | 10:11 +00:06 |
| Sled Push | 04:55 | 15:15 | 03:42 +01:13 | 16:12 -00:57 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 20:10 | 06:42 -01:27 | 19:54 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 07:27 | 25:25 | 06:33 +00:54 | 26:36 -01:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:00 | 32:52 | 06:40 -01:40 | 33:09 -00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 11:44 | 37:52 | 07:36 +04:08 | 39:49 -01:57 |
| Running 5 | 05:23 | 49:36 | 06:59 -01:36 | 47:25 +02:11 |
| Rowing | 05:40 | 54:59 | 05:22 +00:18 | 54:24 +00:35 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 01:00:39 | 06:44 -01:45 | 59:46 +00:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:20 | 01:05:38 | 02:47 +00:33 | 01:06:30 -00:52 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 01:08:58 | 06:49 -01:46 | 01:09:17 -00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:00 | 01:14:01 | 07:02 +01:58 | 01:16:06 -02:05 |
| Running 8 | 05:51 | 01:23:01 | 08:17 -02:26 | 01:23:08 -00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 11:15 | 01:28:52 | 09:11 +02:04 | 01:31:25 -02:33 |
| Roxzone | 10:39 | 01:50:37 | 10:01 +00:38 | 01:50:37 |
Joe Green demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, especially considering his strong running ability. Placing in the top 60% of all athletes and top 65% in his age group, Joe displayed a runner's profile, as evident from his total running time of 00:41:45, which was 12:11 faster than the average. However, it seems that he could benefit from a more balanced approach to his training, focusing on both running and strength exercises to further improve his overall ranking.
His performance indicates a strong start with the running segments, consistently maintaining faster than average times. However, it appears that Joe started out slightly slower in Running 1 but quickly picked up the pace, as indicated by the subsequent decreases in his running times. This demonstrates an effective pacing strategy, allowing him to conserve energy for the more strenuous segments of the race.
Based on the analysis of Joe's performance, here are some strategies for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Crugnola Alessio | 2024 Turin | 01:50:20 | |
| Kohler Dirk | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:50:13 | |
| Ehrlich Mike | 2022 New York | 01:50:23 | |
| Zeman Antoine | 2024 Paris | 01:50:33 | |
| Ciudad Real Roberto | 2024 Melbourne | 01:50:36 | |
| Schepis Wayne | 2024 Melbourne | 01:50:34 | |
| Tucker Walter | 2023 Manchester | 01:50:15 | |
| Williams Sam | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:50:25 | |
| Goh Nathaniel | 2024 Singapore | 01:50:08 | |
| Sendelbeck Markus | 2022 München | 01:51:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
