Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 93 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ponto Florent's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ponto Florent's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ponto Florent's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ponto Florent's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 17:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 17:29 | 01:05:56 to 48:27 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:42 to 05:42 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:53 to 05:53 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:18 to 06:18 | 0.0% |
| Ponto Florent | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:47 | 00:00 | 05:19 -01:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 03:47 | 04:38 -00:24 | 05:19 -01:32 |
| Running 2 | 09:38 | 08:01 | 05:41 +03:57 | 09:57 -01:56 |
| Sled Push | 04:47 | 17:39 | 05:12 -00:25 | 15:38 +02:01 |
| Running 3 | 08:27 | 22:26 | 06:15 +02:12 | 20:50 +01:36 |
| Sled Pull | 05:46 | 30:53 | 09:55 -04:09 | 27:05 +03:48 |
| Running 4 | 08:33 | 36:39 | 06:08 +02:25 | 37:00 -00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:42 | 45:12 | 06:25 -00:43 | 43:08 +02:04 |
| Running 5 | 08:45 | 50:54 | 06:21 +02:24 | 49:33 +01:21 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 59:39 | 05:08 -00:33 | 55:54 +03:45 |
| Running 6 | 08:28 | 01:04:14 | 06:14 +02:14 | 01:01:02 +03:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 01:12:42 | 03:16 -00:58 | 01:07:16 +05:26 |
| Running 7 | 08:36 | 01:15:00 | 06:29 +02:07 | 01:10:32 +04:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:53 | 01:23:36 | 07:22 -01:29 | 01:17:01 +06:35 |
| Running 8 | 09:42 | 01:29:29 | 08:04 +01:38 | 01:24:23 +05:06 |
| Wall Balls | 06:18 | 01:39:11 | 10:19 -04:01 | 01:32:27 +06:44 |
| Roxzone | 06:48 | 01:52:17 | 09:31 -02:43 | 01:52:17 |
Based on the splits analysis, Florent performed exceptionally well in the Ski Erg and Rowing segments, where he was faster than the average by 33 seconds and 44 seconds, respectively. He also had a strong performance in the Sled Pull and Burpees Broad Jump segments, where he was faster than the average by 1 minute and 31 seconds and 1 minute and 31 seconds, respectively.
However, there were several segments where Florent lost time compared to the average. These segments include Running 2, Running 4, Running 5, Running 7, Running 6, Running 3, Running 8, and Sled Push. It is important to address these areas of improvement to enhance overall race performance.
In conclusion, Florent Ponto showed strong performance in certain segments of the Hyrox race but also had areas of improvement. By implementing specific training strategies and techniques, focusing on pacing, and optimizing transition time, Florent can enhance his overall race performance and achieve even better results in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Adamu Lesley | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:51:55 | |
| Du Pré Louis | 2024 Paris | 01:52:30 | |
| Challand Kyle | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:52:19 | |
| Pocorni Rodney | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:52:42 | |
| Choi Yeonjae | 2024 Incheon | 01:51:52 | |
| Palazzo Michael | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:52:26 | |
| Harlaß Steffen | 2019 Hannover | 01:52:17 | |
| Patel Miren | 2023 London | 01:52:47 | |
| Loch Reinhard | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:52:22 | |
| Feeley Paul | 2024 Birmingham | 01:52:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
