Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcgimpsey Scott's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcgimpsey Scott's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcgimpsey Scott's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcgimpsey Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 01:03 | 03:20 to 02:17 | 24.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:54 | 07:52 to 06:58 | 21.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:53 | 06:07 to 05:14 | 20.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:39 | 03:43 to 03:04 | 15.4% |
| Rowing | 00:28 | 05:24 to 04:56 | 11.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:17 | 05:45 to 05:28 | 6.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:49 to 42:49 | 0.0% |
| Mcgimpsey Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:27 | 00:00 | 04:52 +00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 05:27 | 04:33 -00:18 | 04:52 +00:35 |
| Running 2 | 04:32 | 09:42 | 05:19 -00:47 | 09:25 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 03:43 | 14:14 | 03:09 +00:34 | 14:44 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:03 | 17:57 | 05:47 -00:44 | 17:53 +00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 06:07 | 23:00 | 05:25 +00:42 | 23:40 -00:40 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 29:07 | 05:47 -00:27 | 29:05 +00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:55 | 34:27 | 06:03 -01:08 | 34:52 -00:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:59 | 39:22 | 05:59 +00:00 | 40:55 -01:33 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 45:21 | 04:58 +00:26 | 46:54 -01:33 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 50:45 | 05:50 -00:14 | 51:52 -01:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:20 | 56:21 | 02:21 +00:59 | 57:42 -01:21 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 59:41 | 05:48 -00:44 | 01:00:03 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:45 | 01:04:45 | 05:39 +00:06 | 01:05:51 -01:06 |
| Running 8 | 05:52 | 01:10:30 | 06:36 -00:44 | 01:11:30 -01:00 |
| Wall Balls | 07:52 | 01:16:22 | 07:20 +00:32 | 01:18:06 -01:44 |
| Roxzone | 09:09 | 01:33:14 | 07:48 +01:21 | 01:33:14 |
Scott Mcgimpsey demonstrated a commendable performance at 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. He particularly excelled in his running, being faster than the average in all eight running segments. His total running time of 00:42:49 was 03:23 faster than the average. This indicates that Scott is a strong runner and has the potential to further optimize his performance. However, he started the first running segment slower than average, which suggests that he may have paced himself a bit too conservatively in the initial phase of the race. His strength segments, on the other hand, need some improvement.
Scott should consider starting the race a bit faster to make the most of his fresh state at the beginning. Given his strong running performance, he should aim to capitalize on these segments and try to maintain a consistent pace. For the strength segments, focusing on proper form and technique could help in reducing time spent. Finally, regular practice of transition between different segments could help in reducing his Roxzone time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cliquet Arnaud | 2024 Paris | 01:33:30 | |
| House John | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:33:32 | |
| Ducès Gilles | 2024 Marseille | 01:33:25 | |
| Van Santen Elric | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:33:44 | |
| Boulton James | 2024 Cape Town | 01:33:17 | |
| Mattsson Mattias | 2024 Stockholm | 01:33:27 | |
| Rolff Hans Christian | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:33:20 | |
| Thompson Sean | 2023 London | 01:33:28 | |
| Lederman Zohar | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:33:28 | |
| De Alba Rodriguez Claudio | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:32:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Malaga | 01:28:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
