Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mather Sean's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mather Sean's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mather Sean's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mather Sean's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:36 | 07:21 to 05:45 | 31.1% |
| Wall Balls | 01:25 | 08:20 to 06:55 | 27.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:06 | 06:32 to 05:26 | 21.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:40 | 05:52 to 05:12 | 12.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:38 to 02:16 | 7.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:08 to 43:08 | 0.0% |
| Mather Sean | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:46 | 00:00 | 04:50 +00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 05:46 | 04:33 -00:02 | 04:50 +00:56 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 10:17 | 05:19 -00:26 | 09:23 +00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 15:10 | 03:09 -00:20 | 14:42 +00:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:07 | 17:59 | 05:46 -00:39 | 17:51 +00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 05:52 | 23:06 | 05:26 +00:26 | 23:37 -00:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:15 | 28:58 | 05:47 -00:32 | 29:03 -00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:21 | 34:13 | 06:01 +01:20 | 34:50 -00:37 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 41:34 | 05:58 -00:27 | 40:51 +00:43 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 47:05 | 04:58 -00:12 | 46:49 +00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:23 | 51:51 | 05:48 -00:25 | 51:47 +00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 57:14 | 02:22 +00:16 | 57:35 -00:21 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 59:52 | 05:47 -00:28 | 59:57 -00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:32 | 01:05:11 | 05:39 +00:53 | 01:05:44 -00:33 |
| Running 8 | 05:58 | 01:11:43 | 06:34 -00:36 | 01:11:23 +00:20 |
| Wall Balls | 08:20 | 01:17:41 | 07:20 +01:00 | 01:17:57 -00:16 |
| Roxzone | 07:12 | 01:33:04 | 07:47 -00:35 | 01:33:04 |
Sean Mather displayed commendable performance during the 2024 Birmingham race. His overall position was in the top 45% of the athletes, showing a strong and competitive performance. With a total running time of 43:08, which was 2:58 faster than the average, it is clear that running is a strong point for Sean. His overall pacing strategy appeared to be effective, with a strong finish in the top 15% in the last running segment. His best running lap time was an impressive 4:53. This indicates that Sean has a runner's profile and his strength lies in his running ability.
Sean should continue to capitalize on his strong running ability, while also focusing on improving his performance in the weaker segments. Implementing a more gradual pace from the start could help conserve energy for the more demanding segments later in the race. Also, focusing on proper form and technique during the strength segments could help improve efficiency and reduce fatigue. Finally, practicing transitions between segments could help reduce the roxzone time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Awiszus Martin | 2021 Hamburg | 01:32:46 | |
| 이 재혁 | 2024 Incheon | 01:33:21 | |
| Steffensen Erik | 2024 Stockholm | 01:32:43 | |
| Rust Stephen | 2024 Dublin | 01:33:09 | |
| Guzzi Roberto | 2022 London | 01:32:35 | |
| Payne Raymond | 2023 Glasgow | 01:33:10 | |
| Fort Dane | 2024 Incheon | 01:33:12 | |
| Medack Jörg | 2022 Berlin | 01:33:08 | |
| Zuidema Bram Jan | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:33:11 | |
| Krause Lukas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:33:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
