Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Grant Kyle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Grant Kyle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Grant Kyle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Grant Kyle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:11 | 53:38 to 45:27 | 96.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 | 05:49 to 05:33 | 3.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 02:57 to 02:57 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:47 to 01:47 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Grant Kyle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:16 | 00:00 | 04:55 +01:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 06:16 | 04:34 -00:19 | 04:55 +01:21 |
| Running 2 | 05:26 | 10:31 | 05:21 +00:05 | 09:29 +01:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 15:57 | 03:12 -01:12 | 14:50 +01:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 17:57 | 05:52 -00:07 | 18:02 -00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 02:57 | 23:42 | 05:30 -02:33 | 23:54 -00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:40 | 26:39 | 05:51 -00:11 | 29:24 -02:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:49 | 32:19 | 06:08 -01:19 | 35:15 -02:56 |
| Running 5 | 05:55 | 37:08 | 06:03 -00:08 | 41:23 -04:15 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 43:03 | 05:00 -00:19 | 47:26 -04:23 |
| Running 6 | 09:45 | 47:44 | 05:52 +03:53 | 52:26 -04:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:47 | 57:29 | 02:24 -00:37 | 58:18 -00:49 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 59:16 | 05:52 +00:17 | 01:00:42 -01:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:49 | 01:05:25 | 05:44 +00:05 | 01:06:34 -01:09 |
| Running 8 | 08:45 | 01:11:14 | 06:41 +02:04 | 01:12:18 -01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 05:24 | 01:19:59 | 07:25 -02:01 | 01:18:59 +01:00 |
| Roxzone | 09:03 | 01:34:19 | 07:55 +01:08 | 01:34:19 |
Kyle Grant's performance in the 2024 Perth HYROX race places him in the top 49% overall and the top 57% within his age group. His strengths lie in strength-based exercises, significantly outperforming average times in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls. However, his total running time was notably slower than the average, suggesting that his running is a potential area for improvement.
Analyzing his pacing, Kyle showed a strong start in the early running segments but struggled significantly in the latter stages, particularly in Running 6 and Running 8. This suggests a tendency to start too fast, leading to fatigue in later stages. Overall, Kyle exhibits a profile that leans more toward strength, with room for development in endurance and running efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De Cataldo Matthew | 2024 Stockholm | 01:34:16 | |
| Gonzalez Caro Inyaki | 2023 Barcelona | 01:34:09 | |
| Williams Clint | 2021 London | 01:33:58 | |
| Donnerbauer Heiko | 2023 Wien | 01:34:08 | |
| Mclaughlin Kevin | 2024 Birmingham | 01:34:37 | |
| Magalhaes Luiz | 2021 New York | 01:34:34 | |
| Ferch Bastian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:34:01 | |
| Carlson Joshua | 2019 Miami | 01:34:02 | |
| Kramer Grant | 2023 Birmingham | 01:34:25 | |
| Vizcarra Alejandro | 2024 Madrid | 01:34:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
