Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Collis Penny's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Collis Penny's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Collis Penny's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Collis Penny's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:02 | 05:16 to 04:14 | 37.6% |
| Run Total | 00:30 | 44:25 to 43:55 | 18.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 05:33 to 05:08 | 15.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 04:41 to 04:23 | 10.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 05:41 to 05:29 | 7.3% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:24 to 05:12 | 7.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:09 to 02:04 | 3.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 02:28 to 02:27 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Collis Penny | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:43 | 00:00 | 05:01 +00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 05:43 | 05:03 -00:19 | 05:01 +00:42 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 10:27 | 05:21 -00:16 | 10:04 +00:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 15:32 | 02:40 -00:12 | 15:25 +00:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 18:00 | 05:37 -00:04 | 18:05 -00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 05:33 | 23:33 | 05:36 -00:03 | 23:42 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 29:06 | 05:40 -00:22 | 29:18 -00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:41 | 34:24 | 05:51 -00:10 | 34:58 -00:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 40:05 | 05:48 -00:20 | 40:49 -00:44 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 45:33 | 05:19 +00:05 | 46:37 -01:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 50:57 | 05:43 -00:06 | 51:56 -00:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 56:34 | 02:11 -00:02 | 57:39 -01:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 58:43 | 05:41 -00:01 | 59:50 -01:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:41 | 01:04:23 | 04:36 +00:05 | 01:05:31 -01:08 |
| Running 8 | 06:04 | 01:09:04 | 06:03 +00:01 | 01:10:07 -01:03 |
| Wall Balls | 05:16 | 01:15:08 | 04:46 +00:30 | 01:16:10 -01:02 |
| Roxzone | 07:15 | 01:27:32 | 06:36 +00:39 | 01:27:32 |
Penny Collis demonstrated an exceptional performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, ranking within the top 10% of both the overall competition and within her age group. Notably, her total running time was faster than the average by 57 seconds, suggesting Penny possesses a strong runner profile. However, her roxzone time was slower than average, indicating room for improvement in overall fitness and transition time.
Her start to the race was slightly slower compared to the average in the first running segment, potentially indicating a conservative approach to pacing. However, she consistently improved her running splits as the race progressed, suggesting she was able to efficiently manage her energy and increase her speed throughout the competition. This is a direct reflection of her competitive endurance and strategic race approach.
To improve her race performance, Penny should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Louise | 2023 Dublin | 01:27:45 | |
| Beyer Annika | 2022 Hamburg | 01:27:22 | |
| oh eunji | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:27:35 | |
| Maiwald Michelle | 2023 Hannover | 01:27:27 | |
| Heinrich Hanna | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:27:27 | |
| Blonska Katarzyna | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:09 | |
| Verheyden Deborah | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:27:27 | |
| Rubens Vera | 2023 Hamburg | 01:27:37 | |
| Sintive Chloé | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:27:18 | |
| Bruton Naomi | 2021 Birmingham | 01:27:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
