Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mayr Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mayr Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mayr Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mayr Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:46 | 36:31 to 33:45 | 47.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:05 | 04:21 to 03:16 | 18.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:02 | 04:23 to 03:21 | 17.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 02:34 to 01:54 | 11.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:18 to 04:00 | 5.1% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:19 to 04:17 | 0.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:19 to 01:19 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:26 to 03:26 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Mayr Thomas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:16 | 00:00 | 03:53 -00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 03:16 | 04:09 +00:09 | 03:53 -00:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:10 | 07:34 | 04:07 +00:03 | 08:02 -00:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:34 | 11:44 | 02:23 +00:11 | 12:09 -00:25 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 14:18 | 04:24 +00:34 | 14:32 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 04:23 | 19:16 | 03:48 +00:35 | 18:56 +00:20 |
| Running 4 | 04:30 | 23:39 | 04:24 +00:06 | 22:44 +00:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:21 | 28:09 | 03:48 +00:33 | 27:08 +01:01 |
| Running 5 | 04:47 | 32:30 | 04:30 +00:17 | 30:56 +01:34 |
| Rowing | 04:19 | 37:17 | 04:24 -00:05 | 35:26 +01:51 |
| Running 6 | 04:43 | 41:36 | 04:26 +00:17 | 39:50 +01:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:19 | 46:19 | 01:46 -00:27 | 44:16 +02:03 |
| Running 7 | 04:56 | 47:38 | 04:25 +00:31 | 46:02 +01:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:26 | 52:34 | 03:52 -00:26 | 50:27 +02:07 |
| Running 8 | 05:15 | 56:00 | 04:42 +00:33 | 54:19 +01:41 |
| Wall Balls | 03:58 | 01:01:15 | 04:52 -00:54 | 59:01 +02:14 |
| Roxzone | 03:35 | 01:08:39 | 04:46 -01:11 | 01:08:39 |
In terms of his splits analysis, Thomas performed above average in the Running 1 and Sled Push segments, demonstrating his strength and speed. However, he struggled in the Burpees Broad Jump, Running 3, Running 7, Running 8, Running 5, Running 6, Ski Erg, and Sled Pull segments, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
In conclusion, Thomas Mayr had a strong performance in the HYROX race in Munich. By focusing on improving specific segments such as the Burpees Broad Jump, Running 3, Running 7, Running 8, Running 5, Running 6, Ski Erg, and Sled Pull, and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Additionally, paying attention to pacing and transition time will contribute to his overall success. With continued dedication and targeted training, Thomas has the potential to achieve even greater results in his upcoming races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| O Dwyer Garreth | 2024 Dublin | 01:08:49 | |
| Bijnen Sander | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:08:17 | |
| Sigrén David | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:08:19 | |
| Super Dan | 2024 Malaga | 01:08:48 | |
| Humblot Loïc | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:08:31 | |
| Riley Sean | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:08:30 | |
| Broxton Steven | 2024 Paris | 01:08:51 | |
| Hamilton David | 2023 Birmingham | 01:08:52 | |
| Davis Luke | 2024 Dublin | 01:09:07 | |
| Leggat Deon | 2024 Gdansk | 01:08:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:19:12 | |
| 2024 Berlin | 01:08:34 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:09:22 | |
| 2023 Barcelona | 01:14:02 | |
| 2023 Frankfurt | 01:11:43 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:11:28 | |
| 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:20:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
