Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Thompson James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Thompson James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Thompson James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Thompson James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:52 | 06:14 to 04:22 | 46.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:45 | 04:57 to 04:12 | 18.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:38 | 05:03 to 04:25 | 15.8% |
| Run Total | 00:34 | 39:38 to 39:04 | 14.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 05:36 to 05:25 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:37 to 01:37 | 0.0% |
| Thompson James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 04:21 -00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 04:20 | 04:21 -00:07 | 04:21 -00:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 08:34 | 04:42 -00:04 | 08:42 -00:08 |
| Sled Push | 01:42 | 13:12 | 02:42 -01:00 | 13:24 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 04:54 | 14:54 | 05:05 -00:11 | 16:06 -01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 04:57 | 19:48 | 04:32 +00:25 | 21:11 -01:23 |
| Running 4 | 04:48 | 24:45 | 05:04 -00:16 | 25:43 -00:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 29:33 | 04:47 +00:16 | 30:47 -01:14 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 34:36 | 05:13 -00:14 | 35:34 -00:58 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 39:35 | 04:40 -00:06 | 40:47 -01:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 44:09 | 05:05 -00:02 | 45:27 -01:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:37 | 49:12 | 02:02 -00:25 | 50:32 -01:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 50:49 | 05:04 +00:07 | 52:34 -01:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:14 | 56:00 | 04:40 +01:34 | 57:38 -01:38 |
| Running 8 | 05:47 | 01:02:14 | 05:32 +00:15 | 01:02:18 -00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 05:36 | 01:08:01 | 05:53 -00:17 | 01:07:50 +00:11 |
| Roxzone | 06:19 | 01:19:49 | 06:06 +00:13 | 01:19:49 |
James Thompson delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 336, placing him in the top 18% of participants. Within his age group (35-39), he ranked 78th, which corresponds to the top 20%. His total running time was 00:39:38, which is notably 47 seconds faster than average. This suggests James has a strong runner profile.
In terms of pacing, James started slightly slower than average during his first running segment but progressively improved, maintaining a steady pace in subsequent segments. This indicates a well-managed race strategy, avoiding the common pitfall of starting too fast. However, his performances in strength-based exercises varied, with strengths in some areas and room for improvement in others.
By focusing on these areas and implementing targeted training strategies, James can expect to enhance his performance in future Hyrox races significantly.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Godfrey Peter | 2024 London | 01:19:36 | |
| Lohse Holger | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:19:23 | |
| Faul Brian | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:55 | |
| Diston Darren | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:19:46 | |
| Whelan Daniel | 2024 Glasgow | 01:19:22 | |
| Saunderson Mark | 2023 Manchester | 01:20:04 | |
| Mccarter Graeme | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:56 | |
| Williams Jamie | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:09 | |
| Mantovani Daniele | 2024 Turin | 01:19:54 | |
| Williams Ross | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
