Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 467 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:59 (From 01:01:11 to 54:12) | 91.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:19 (From 07:15 to 06:56) | 4.2% |
| Rowing | 00:15 (From 05:42 to 05:27) | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 (From 04:59 to 04:56) | 0.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 03:29 to 03:29) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 06:33 to 06:33) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:52 to 02:52) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 07:01 to 07:01) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 08:12 to 08:12) | 0.0% |
| Tate Graham | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:12 | 00:00 | 05:34 -01:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:59 | 04:12 | 04:54 +00:05 | 05:34 -01:22 |
| Running 2 | 07:02 | 09:11 | 06:20 +00:42 | 10:28 -01:17 |
| Sled Push | 03:29 | 16:13 | 03:56 -00:27 | 16:48 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 08:06 | 19:42 | 07:08 +00:58 | 20:44 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 07:15 | 27:48 | 07:00 +00:15 | 27:52 -00:04 |
| Running 4 | 07:28 | 35:03 | 07:08 +00:20 | 34:52 +00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:33 | 42:31 | 08:22 -01:49 | 42:00 +00:31 |
| Running 5 | 08:08 | 49:04 | 07:35 +00:33 | 50:22 -01:18 |
| Rowing | 05:42 | 57:12 | 05:31 +00:11 | 57:57 -00:45 |
| Running 6 | 08:31 | 01:02:54 | 07:16 +01:15 | 01:03:28 -00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:52 | 01:11:25 | 02:52 +00:00 | 01:10:44 +00:41 |
| Running 7 | 08:56 | 01:14:17 | 07:18 +01:38 | 01:13:36 +00:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:01 | 01:23:13 | 07:43 -00:42 | 01:20:54 +02:19 |
| Running 8 | 08:52 | 01:30:14 | 09:09 -00:17 | 01:28:37 +01:37 |
| Wall Balls | 08:12 | 01:39:06 | 09:51 -01:39 | 01:37:46 +01:20 |
| Roxzone | 11:18 | 01:58:28 | 10:51 +00:27 | 01:58:28 |
Based on the splits analysis, Graham's overall running time of 01:01:11 was 05:41 slower than average. This suggests that he may benefit from focusing more on his running training to improve his overall fitness and speed. Additionally, his total running time was slower than average, indicating that he may need to work on his transition time between exercise zones.
In summary, Graham Tate performed well in the Hyrox race in Dublin, but there are areas where he can improve his performance. Focusing on improving his running endurance, speed, and transition time can help him enhance his overall race performance. Incorporating specific drills and exercises tailored to these areas of improvement can lead to significant performance gains. Additionally, implementing race strategies such as pacing and mental preparation can further enhance his performance on race day.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brown Mark | 2023 München | 01:58:15 | |
| Paul Jason | 2024 Singapore | 01:57:58 | |
| Afonoghara Efe | 2024 Hamburg | 01:58:18 | |
| Olk Sven | 2018 Essen | 01:58:53 | |
| Griffeth Tavin | 2023 Dallas | 01:58:20 | |
| Tang Chiu Fai | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:58:42 | |
| Vear Gary | 2024 Manchester | 01:58:14 | |
| Van Der Straten Olaf | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:58:06 | |
| Dodson Matt | 2024 Stockholm | 01:57:59 | |
| Simons Ralf | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:58:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Tate Graham
