Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcdermott Jacob's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcdermott Jacob's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcdermott Jacob's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcdermott Jacob's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:08 | 06:45 to 05:37 | 28.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:52 | 03:51 to 02:59 | 21.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:44 | 06:03 to 05:19 | 18.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 05:35 to 05:06 | 12.1% |
| Run Total | 00:26 | 44:43 to 44:17 | 10.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:33 to 02:13 | 8.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:39 to 05:39 | 0.0% |
| Mcdermott Jacob | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:55 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 03:55 | 04:33 -00:13 | 04:47 -00:52 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 08:15 | 05:16 +00:05 | 09:20 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:51 | 13:36 | 03:08 +00:43 | 14:36 -01:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:48 | 17:27 | 05:45 +00:03 | 17:44 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 05:35 | 23:15 | 05:22 +00:13 | 23:29 -00:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 28:50 | 05:44 +00:03 | 28:51 -00:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:45 | 34:37 | 05:56 +00:49 | 34:35 +00:02 |
| Running 5 | 05:51 | 41:22 | 05:56 -00:05 | 40:31 +00:51 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 47:13 | 04:58 -00:21 | 46:27 +00:46 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 51:50 | 05:47 +00:02 | 51:25 +00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 57:39 | 02:21 +00:12 | 57:12 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:44 | 01:00:12 | 05:44 +00:00 | 59:33 +00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:03 | 01:05:56 | 05:32 +00:31 | 01:05:17 +00:39 |
| Running 8 | 06:31 | 01:11:59 | 06:31 +00:00 | 01:10:49 +01:10 |
| Wall Balls | 05:39 | 01:18:30 | 07:11 -01:32 | 01:17:20 +01:10 |
| Roxzone | 08:08 | 01:32:09 | 07:38 +00:30 | 01:32:09 |
Jacob Mcdermott demonstrated a commendable performance in the Hyrox race, with a finish ranking in the top 34% of the total participants and the top 41% of his age group. He showcased a strong aptitude for running, with a total running time that was a full minute faster than the average. His pacing was excellent in the beginning, with a first running split that was significantly faster than the average. However, he seems to struggle more with strength-oriented exercises, as indicated by a slower Roxzone time, suggesting possible areas for improvement.
Firstly, Jacob should aim to maintain a steady pace throughout the race, rather than starting too fast and potentially exhausting himself for later segments. This could be achieved through regular tempo runs and interval training. Secondly, focusing on his transitions between exercises, particularly between strength and running segments, could shave off valuable seconds from his overall time. Lastly, improving his endurance for strength-based exercises through a tailored strength training program would likely significantly improve his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Muir David | 2023 Dublin | 01:32:15 | |
| Hagn Sebastian | 2022 Berlin | 01:32:15 | |
| Howard Ryan | 2023 Chicago | 01:32:32 | |
| Romero Omar | 2022 Chicago | 01:32:09 | |
| Schiegerl Mario | 2023 München | 01:31:58 | |
| Jakovljevic Aleksandar | 2024 Stockholm | 01:32:28 | |
| Hall Christopher | 2023 London | 01:31:41 | |
| Escamilla Eric | 2024 Houston | 01:32:11 | |
| Diessner Michael | 2021 Hamburg | 01:32:18 | |
| Chang Richard | 2024 Singapore | 01:31:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
