Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lanzi Marcello's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lanzi Marcello's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lanzi Marcello's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lanzi Marcello's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:16 | 54:41 to 49:25 | 73.8% |
| Sled Push | 01:21 | 04:54 to 03:33 | 18.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:31 | 05:15 to 04:44 | 7.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:55 to 05:55 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:12 to 06:12 | 0.0% |
| Lanzi Marcello | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:20 | 00:00 | 05:14 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:15 | 05:20 | 04:42 +00:33 | 05:14 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 10:35 | 05:46 -00:39 | 09:56 +00:39 |
| Sled Push | 04:54 | 15:42 | 03:29 +01:25 | 15:42 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 06:33 | 20:36 | 06:22 +00:11 | 19:11 +01:25 |
| Sled Pull | 05:55 | 27:09 | 06:03 -00:08 | 25:33 +01:36 |
| Running 4 | 06:45 | 33:04 | 06:21 +00:24 | 31:36 +01:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:39 | 39:49 | 06:55 -02:16 | 37:57 +01:52 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 44:28 | 06:37 -00:03 | 44:52 -00:24 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 51:02 | 05:13 -00:08 | 51:29 -00:27 |
| Running 6 | 06:37 | 56:07 | 06:24 +00:13 | 56:42 -00:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 01:02:44 | 02:35 -00:39 | 01:03:06 -00:22 |
| Running 7 | 09:04 | 01:04:40 | 06:23 +02:41 | 01:05:41 -01:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:13:44 | 06:30 -01:19 | 01:12:04 +01:40 |
| Running 8 | 08:44 | 01:18:55 | 07:36 +01:08 | 01:18:34 +00:21 |
| Wall Balls | 06:12 | 01:27:39 | 08:27 -02:15 | 01:26:10 +01:29 |
| Roxzone | 10:05 | 01:43:50 | 09:13 +00:52 | 01:43:50 |
Lanzi's total running time of 00:54:41 was 06:22 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time to decrease the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap of 00:05:07 indicates that he has the potential to excel in running, but there is room for improvement in other segments.
In summary, Marcello Lanzi had a solid performance in the Hyrox race in Milan. To improve his performance, he should focus on improving his overall fitness, transition time, and specific segments such as running 7 and running 8. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and efficient transitions, Lanzi can enhance his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pimienta Galvan Diego | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:43:38 | |
| Bergonzi Nicola | 2024 Milan | 01:44:03 | |
| Tardy Quentin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:43:21 | |
| Wilcox Mark | 2024 London | 01:43:37 | |
| Swart Sidney | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:44:08 | |
| Moses Steven | 2022 Birmingham | 01:43:55 | |
| Corrigan Stuart | 2024 Madrid | 01:44:18 | |
| Snooks Leigh | 2023 Melbourne | 01:43:28 | |
| Faller Kevin | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:43:35 | |
| Wertz Malte | 2024 Köln | 01:44:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rimini | 01:26:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
