Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Piva Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Piva Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Piva Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Piva Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:14 | 06:17 to 05:03 | 33.5% |
| Run Total | 01:03 | 43:54 to 42:51 | 28.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:56 | 06:13 to 05:17 | 25.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 05:19 to 04:51 | 12.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:54 to 05:54 | 0.0% |
| Piva Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:42 | 00:00 | 04:43 +00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 05:42 | 04:29 -00:05 | 04:43 +00:59 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 10:06 | 05:06 +00:07 | 09:12 +00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:05 | 15:19 | 02:59 -00:54 | 14:18 +01:01 |
| Running 3 | 05:18 | 17:24 | 05:33 -00:15 | 17:17 +00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 05:19 | 22:42 | 05:06 +00:13 | 22:50 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:22 | 28:01 | 05:32 -00:10 | 27:56 +00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:13 | 33:23 | 05:36 +00:37 | 33:28 -00:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 39:36 | 05:43 -00:13 | 39:04 +00:32 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 45:06 | 04:52 -00:06 | 44:47 +00:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:28 | 49:52 | 05:34 -00:06 | 49:39 +00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 55:20 | 02:15 -00:29 | 55:13 +00:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:36 | 57:06 | 05:33 +00:03 | 57:28 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:17 | 01:02:42 | 05:21 +00:56 | 01:03:01 -00:19 |
| Running 8 | 05:49 | 01:08:59 | 06:13 -00:24 | 01:08:22 +00:37 |
| Wall Balls | 05:54 | 01:14:48 | 06:47 -00:53 | 01:14:35 +00:13 |
| Roxzone | 07:54 | 01:28:28 | 07:06 +00:48 | 01:28:28 |
Andrew Piva delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 634, which places him in the top 35% of all competitors and the top 33% within his age group. His total running time was notably faster than the average by 24 seconds, demonstrating a strong running capability. His best running lap was an impressive 5:13, indicating his potential as a runner. However, Andrew's performance across the running segments suggests a somewhat inconsistent pace, starting slower than average in the initial run and gradually improving. This pattern indicates potential pacing issues, where he might have started too conservatively and gained speed later. Andrew's performance suggests a strong runner profile, with room for improvement in strength-oriented exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shagrin Martin | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:39 | |
| Sosa Mario | 2020 Dallas | 01:28:04 | |
| Wilson Evan | 2023 New York | 01:28:30 | |
| Dobbs Gary | 2023 Dallas | 01:28:40 | |
| Haußknecht Leon | 2024 Hamburg | 01:28:10 | |
| Reverberi Cristian | 2024 Rimini | 01:28:26 | |
| Stephan Andreas | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:28:34 | |
| Jones James | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:55 | |
| Winterflood Will | 2023 London | 01:27:58 | |
| Funken Jens | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:28:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
