Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Makinson Amy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Makinson Amy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Makinson Amy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Makinson Amy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:25 | 05:48 to 04:23 | 47.0% |
| Run Total | 00:55 | 45:33 to 44:38 | 30.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:22 | 04:52 to 04:30 | 12.2% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:25 to 05:15 | 5.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:09 | 05:48 to 05:39 | 5.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:12 to 02:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Makinson Amy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:06 | 00:00 | 05:09 +00:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 06:06 | 05:06 -00:18 | 05:09 +00:57 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 10:54 | 05:26 +00:01 | 10:15 +00:39 |
| Sled Push | 02:12 | 16:21 | 02:43 -00:31 | 15:41 +00:40 |
| Running 3 | 05:50 | 18:33 | 05:44 +00:06 | 18:24 +00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 04:36 | 24:23 | 05:41 -01:05 | 24:08 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:43 | 28:59 | 05:45 -00:02 | 29:49 -00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:48 | 34:42 | 05:58 -00:10 | 35:34 -00:52 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 40:30 | 05:53 -00:16 | 41:32 -01:02 |
| Rowing | 05:25 | 46:07 | 05:21 +00:04 | 47:25 -01:18 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 51:32 | 05:47 -00:14 | 52:46 -01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 57:05 | 02:15 -00:17 | 58:33 -01:28 |
| Running 7 | 05:29 | 59:03 | 05:45 -00:16 | 01:00:48 -01:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:52 | 01:04:32 | 04:41 +00:11 | 01:06:33 -02:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:52 | 01:09:24 | 06:07 -00:15 | 01:11:14 -01:50 |
| Wall Balls | 05:48 | 01:15:16 | 04:52 +00:56 | 01:17:21 -02:05 |
| Roxzone | 08:03 | 01:28:58 | 06:45 +01:18 | 01:28:58 |
Amy Makinson put in a commendable performance, ranking in the top 12% of all athletes and her age group. Her overall time of 01:28:58 is a testament to her fitness and endurance. Remarkably, her total running time was 00:26 faster than average, indicating a strong running profile.
An area of concern is her pacing in the initial stage of the race. The time for Running 1 was 00:58 slower than average, indicating a slower start compared to her peers. However, she managed to compensate for this slower start in the later stages of the race, maintaining an above-average pace in most of the running segments.
Considering her strength training, Amy showed exceptional performance in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, finishing well ahead of the average time. This indicates a good balance of strength and running ability, marking her as a hybrid athlete.
Implementing the following strategies could help Amy improve her race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Peyregne | 2023 Valencia | 01:28:43 | |
| Bautista Serantes Olga | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:36 | |
| Dorby Kirsty | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:29:20 | |
| Schneider Anna | 2021 Hamburg | 01:29:09 | |
| Feldmann Kerstin | 2023 Hamburg | 01:29:25 | |
| Giacomello Marta | 2024 Milan | 01:28:35 | |
| Kopałka Justyna | 2024 Poznan | 01:29:11 | |
| Maheux Nathalie | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:28:28 | |
| Tauer Sandra | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:29:11 | |
| Gutierrez Magali | 2024 Anaheim | 01:28:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:33:49 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
