Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lewis Mike's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lewis Mike's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lewis Mike's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lewis Mike's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:42 | 09:21 to 06:39 | 67.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:53 | 05:55 to 05:02 | 22.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:17 | 05:32 to 05:15 | 7.1% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 05:01 to 04:52 | 3.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:46 to 02:46 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:48 to 43:48 | 0.0% |
| Lewis Mike | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:44 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 05:44 | 04:31 -00:05 | 04:46 +00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 10:10 | 05:11 -00:02 | 09:17 +00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 15:19 | 03:04 -00:18 | 14:28 +00:51 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 18:05 | 05:40 -00:10 | 17:32 +00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 05:55 | 23:35 | 05:17 +00:38 | 23:12 +00:23 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 29:30 | 05:38 -00:18 | 28:29 +01:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:32 | 34:50 | 05:49 -01:17 | 34:07 +00:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 39:22 | 05:51 -00:25 | 39:56 -00:34 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 44:48 | 04:56 +00:05 | 45:47 -00:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 49:49 | 05:41 -00:15 | 50:43 -00:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 55:15 | 02:18 -00:33 | 56:24 -01:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 57:00 | 05:39 -00:16 | 58:42 -01:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:32 | 01:02:23 | 05:31 +00:01 | 01:04:21 -01:58 |
| Running 8 | 05:53 | 01:07:55 | 06:23 -00:30 | 01:09:52 -01:57 |
| Wall Balls | 09:21 | 01:13:48 | 07:04 +02:17 | 01:16:15 -02:27 |
| Roxzone | 07:52 | 01:30:53 | 07:34 +00:18 | 01:30:53 |
In terms of his splits analysis, Mike struggled in the Running 1 segment, where he was 01:06 slower than average. He also had some time lost in the Wall Balls, Best Lap, Roxzone, and Sled Pull segments. However, he had strong performances in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Running 3, and Burpees Broad Jump segments.
Mike's pacing throughout the race was relatively consistent, with no extreme fluctuations in his splits. However, he could benefit from improving his speed in the Running 1 segment and his efficiency in the Wall Balls segment.
Based on his splits and overall time, Mike seems to have a hybrid profile, with a good balance of running and strength abilities.
Overall, Mike Lewis had a solid performance in the HYROX race in Birmingham. By focusing on improving his speed in the Running 1 segment, efficiency in the Wall Balls segment, and overall fitness for the Roxzone, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques tailored to these areas of improvement will help him reach his full potential as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 신 정환 | 2024 Incheon | 01:30:37 | |
| A Alok | 2023 Dubai | 01:31:05 | |
| Carignano Mirco | 2024 Turin | 01:30:44 | |
| Stabile Joseph | 2019 New York | 01:30:29 | |
| Ham Tom | 2023 Melbourne | 01:30:56 | |
| Williams Clint | 2023 London | 01:31:13 | |
| Sadler Kevin | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:38 | |
| Mann Jason | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:58 | |
| Zwittnigg Florian | 2019 Wien | 01:30:56 | |
| Mclaughlin Gavin | 2024 Dublin | 01:30:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:31:00 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:38:31 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:31:30 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
