Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Grant Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Grant Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Grant Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Grant Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:47 | 08:18 to 05:31 | 40.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:46 | 07:56 to 06:10 | 25.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:48 | 08:12 to 07:24 | 11.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:36 | 03:50 to 03:14 | 8.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 02:53 to 02:24 | 7.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 05:00 to 04:37 | 5.6% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:04 to 05:01 | 0.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:19 to 41:19 | 0.0% |
| Grant Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:01 | 00:00 | 04:59 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 04:01 | 04:38 +00:22 | 04:59 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 09:01 | 05:27 -00:21 | 09:37 -00:36 |
| Sled Push | 03:50 | 14:07 | 03:17 +00:33 | 15:04 -00:57 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 17:57 | 06:00 -00:38 | 18:21 -00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 08:18 | 23:19 | 05:39 +02:39 | 24:21 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 04:55 | 31:37 | 05:56 -01:01 | 30:00 +01:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:56 | 36:32 | 06:23 +01:33 | 35:56 +00:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:15 | 44:28 | 06:12 -00:57 | 42:19 +02:09 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 49:43 | 05:04 +00:00 | 48:31 +01:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 54:47 | 06:01 -00:41 | 53:35 +01:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:53 | 01:00:07 | 02:26 +00:27 | 59:36 +00:31 |
| Running 7 | 05:06 | 01:03:00 | 06:00 -00:54 | 01:02:02 +00:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:21 | 01:08:06 | 05:57 -00:36 | 01:08:02 +00:04 |
| Running 8 | 06:16 | 01:13:27 | 06:56 -00:40 | 01:13:59 -00:32 |
| Wall Balls | 08:12 | 01:19:43 | 07:45 +00:27 | 01:20:55 -01:12 |
| Roxzone | 09:06 | 01:36:56 | 08:16 +00:50 | 01:36:56 |
Mark Grant delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Paris Hyrox race. It's evident that Mark's running abilities are his strength, clearly indicated by his total running time of 00:41:19 which is 06:21 faster than the average. Mark's pace throughout the race was also commendable, starting off strong in the first four running segments with faster-than-average times.
However, there is room for improvement. While his running times were consistently faster than average, his roxzone time of 00:09:06 was slower, indicating a need to improve transition times and overall fitness. Furthermore, his percentile ranks in strength-based segments such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Burpees Broad Jump were higher, indicating a potential for further development in these areas.
Mark should consider the following strategies for his next race:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Atterling Philip | 2024 Malaga | 01:37:06 | |
| Van De Groep Marijn | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:37:26 | |
| Spinks Chris | 2023 Manchester | 01:36:48 | |
| Gareddu Gianluca | 2024 Rimini | 01:36:54 | |
| Cortez Jesus | 2024 Houston | 01:37:15 | |
| Zinniel Tobias | 2023 Köln | 01:36:38 | |
| Campbell Christopher | 2023 Dublin | 01:36:50 | |
| Roos Jan | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:36:26 | |
| Brusaferri Claudio | 2024 Turin | 01:36:33 | |
| Sullivan Ben | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:37:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
