Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cushion Ollie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cushion Ollie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cushion Ollie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cushion Ollie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:55 | 09:20 to 06:25 | 52.2% |
| Run Total | 01:34 | 44:35 to 43:01 | 28.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:43 | 05:36 to 04:53 | 12.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:17 | 05:22 to 05:05 | 5.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:06 | 02:57 to 02:51 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Cushion Ollie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:37 | 00:00 | 04:45 -01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 03:37 | 04:29 -00:19 | 04:45 -01:08 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 07:47 | 05:06 -00:18 | 09:14 -01:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 12:35 | 02:59 -00:02 | 14:20 -01:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 15:32 | 05:33 +00:03 | 17:19 -01:47 |
| Sled Pull | 05:36 | 21:08 | 05:07 +00:29 | 22:52 -01:44 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 26:44 | 05:33 +00:28 | 27:59 -01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:15 | 32:45 | 05:38 -01:23 | 33:32 -00:47 |
| Running 5 | 06:20 | 37:00 | 05:43 +00:37 | 39:10 -02:10 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 43:20 | 04:53 -00:19 | 44:53 -01:33 |
| Running 6 | 05:52 | 47:54 | 05:35 +00:17 | 49:46 -01:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 53:46 | 02:15 -00:20 | 55:21 -01:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:59 | 55:41 | 05:33 +00:26 | 57:36 -01:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:22 | 01:01:40 | 05:22 +00:00 | 01:03:09 -01:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:26 | 01:07:02 | 06:14 +00:12 | 01:08:31 -01:29 |
| Wall Balls | 09:20 | 01:13:28 | 06:48 +02:32 | 01:14:45 -01:17 |
| Roxzone | 06:05 | 01:28:44 | 07:11 -01:06 | 01:28:44 |
In terms of his splits, Ollie performed exceptionally well in Running 1, Ski Erg, Running 2, Sled Push, and Burpees Broad Jump. He was consistently faster than the average in these segments, indicating a strong level of fitness and skill.
However, Ollie struggled in several segments, including Wall Balls, Running 5, Running 4, Running 7, and Running 6. In these segments, he lost significant time compared to the average. These areas should be the focus of his training and improvement strategies.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on improving the identified areas of weakness, Ollie Cushion can enhance his performance in future HYROX races. With targeted training and a focus on pacing and transitions, he has the potential to achieve even better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Miller Simon | 2023 London | 01:28:54 | |
| Mokri Mohamed Khalil | 2023 Paris | 01:28:38 | |
| Reckemeier Andreas | 2024 Hamburg | 01:29:04 | |
| Gillenwater Ashley | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:34 | |
| Ferry Valentin | 2024 Paris | 01:29:07 | |
| Marschner Yannik | 2024 Hamburg | 01:28:51 | |
| Grasmeier Bernd | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:29:14 | |
| Stachura Jan | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:28:57 | |
| Martin Dominique | 2023 Barcelona | 01:28:52 | |
| Shiplee Carl | 2024 London | 01:28:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
