Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cunningham Holly's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cunningham Holly's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cunningham Holly's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cunningham Holly's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:21 | 47:09 to 44:48 | 42.7% |
| Sled Pull | 02:06 | 07:24 to 05:18 | 38.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 04:58 to 04:32 | 7.9% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 05:32 to 05:16 | 4.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:19 to 02:06 | 3.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 02:40 to 02:32 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Cunningham Holly | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:05 | 00:00 | 05:09 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:45 | 05:05 | 05:06 -00:21 | 05:09 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 09:50 | 05:26 -00:24 | 10:15 -00:25 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 14:52 | 02:44 -00:04 | 15:41 -00:49 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 17:32 | 05:45 -00:29 | 18:25 -00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 07:24 | 22:48 | 05:41 +01:43 | 24:10 -01:22 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 30:12 | 05:45 -00:14 | 29:51 +00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 35:43 | 05:58 -00:28 | 35:36 +00:07 |
| Running 5 | 05:44 | 41:13 | 05:53 -00:09 | 41:34 -00:21 |
| Rowing | 05:32 | 46:57 | 05:21 +00:11 | 47:27 -00:30 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 52:29 | 05:48 +00:19 | 52:48 -00:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 58:36 | 02:15 +00:04 | 58:36 +00:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:52 | 01:00:55 | 05:45 +00:07 | 01:00:51 +00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:58 | 01:06:47 | 04:42 +00:16 | 01:06:36 +00:11 |
| Running 8 | 08:35 | 01:11:45 | 06:07 +02:28 | 01:11:18 +00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 03:57 | 01:20:20 | 04:52 -00:55 | 01:17:25 +02:55 |
| Roxzone | 04:50 | 01:29:01 | 06:44 -01:54 | 01:29:01 |
From the splits analysis, we can see that Holly performed well in certain segments, such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Farmers Carry, Wall Balls, and Roxzone. She was faster than the average time in these segments, indicating her strength in these areas.
However, there were also segments where Holly lost time compared to the average. These segments include the Sled Pull, Running 1, Running 6, Rowing, Sandbag Lunges, Running 8, and the Best Lap. These segments should be the focus of her improvement efforts.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific training techniques, Holly can enhance her performance in future Hyrox races and continue to improve her overall rankings.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Peek Brooke | 2023 Dallas | 01:29:03 | |
| Warren Bryony | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:22 | |
| Parker Amy | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:22 | |
| Mccracken Jen | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:42 | |
| Wegner Paula | 2022 München | 01:29:19 | |
| Cunneen Stephanie | 2024 London | 01:29:02 | |
| Anderson Britt | 2022 New York | 01:28:43 | |
| Thiedeman Daniella | 2021 Chicago | 01:28:43 | |
| Osullivan Jen | 2023 Dublin | 01:29:30 | |
| Curran Megan | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:42:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
