Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Paterson Ian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Paterson Ian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Paterson Ian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Paterson Ian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 05:08 to 02:52 | 37.7% |
| Run Total | 01:39 | 44:50 to 43:11 | 27.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:59 | 07:27 to 06:28 | 16.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:49 | 05:56 to 05:07 | 13.6% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:59 to 04:49 | 2.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:08 | 05:02 to 04:54 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Paterson Ian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:03 | 00:00 | 04:45 +01:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 06:03 | 04:30 -00:05 | 04:45 +01:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 10:28 | 05:07 +00:06 | 09:15 +01:13 |
| Sled Push | 05:08 | 15:41 | 03:01 +02:07 | 14:22 +01:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 20:49 | 05:34 -00:19 | 17:23 +03:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 26:04 | 05:10 -00:08 | 22:57 +03:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 31:06 | 05:34 -00:11 | 28:07 +02:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:32 | 36:29 | 05:41 -01:09 | 33:41 +02:48 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 41:01 | 05:45 -00:23 | 39:22 +01:39 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 46:23 | 04:53 +00:06 | 45:07 +01:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 51:22 | 05:35 +00:14 | 50:00 +01:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 57:11 | 02:16 -00:26 | 55:35 +01:36 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 59:01 | 05:34 +00:06 | 57:51 +01:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:56 | 01:04:41 | 05:25 +00:31 | 01:03:25 +01:16 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:10:37 | 06:15 -00:06 | 01:08:50 +01:47 |
| Wall Balls | 07:27 | 01:16:46 | 06:52 +00:35 | 01:15:05 +01:41 |
| Roxzone | 05:09 | 01:29:14 | 07:17 -02:08 | 01:29:14 |
In terms of pacing, Ian's total running time of 00:44:50 was 02:23 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may need to work on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:13 indicates that he has the potential to excel in running segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lipiecki Przemyslaw | 2024 Katowice | 01:29:41 | |
| Beevers Ben | 2024 Rimini | 01:28:57 | |
| Nodwell Stuart | 2022 Birmingham | 01:29:38 | |
| Garn Tom | 2022 Berlin | 01:29:35 | |
| Gill George | 2024 London | 01:28:53 | |
| Marsh Calum | 2024 Berlin | 01:28:50 | |
| Bruno Joseph | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:29:34 | |
| Edwards Wesley | 2023 Anaheim | 01:29:39 | |
| Paro Damian | 2023 München | 01:29:01 | |
| Schaelli Philipp | 2021 London | 01:29:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Birmingham | 01:40:42 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:30:56 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:26:46 | |
| 2022 London | 01:43:59 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:23:19 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:33:48 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:34:16 | |
| 2023 London | 01:29:25 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
