Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Meredith Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Meredith Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Meredith Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Meredith Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:35 | 10:30 to 07:55 | 38.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:29 | 08:03 to 06:34 | 21.8% |
| Run Total | 01:28 | 49:44 to 48:16 | 21.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:35 | 04:00 to 03:25 | 8.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:32 | 06:38 to 06:06 | 7.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:38 to 02:32 | 1.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:44 to 04:41 | 0.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Meredith Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:46 | 00:00 | 05:08 +01:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 06:46 | 04:39 +00:05 | 05:08 +01:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:42 | 11:30 | 05:40 +00:02 | 09:47 +01:43 |
| Sled Push | 04:00 | 17:12 | 03:29 +00:31 | 15:27 +01:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:54 | 21:12 | 06:13 -00:19 | 18:56 +02:16 |
| Sled Pull | 05:14 | 27:06 | 05:58 -00:44 | 25:09 +01:57 |
| Running 4 | 05:54 | 32:20 | 06:13 -00:19 | 31:07 +01:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:03 | 38:14 | 06:41 +01:22 | 37:20 +00:54 |
| Running 5 | 06:20 | 46:17 | 06:27 -00:07 | 44:01 +02:16 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 52:37 | 05:10 -00:20 | 50:28 +02:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 57:27 | 06:16 -00:09 | 55:38 +01:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 01:03:34 | 02:33 +00:05 | 01:01:54 +01:40 |
| Running 7 | 06:12 | 01:06:12 | 06:16 -00:04 | 01:04:27 +01:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:38 | 01:12:24 | 06:16 +00:22 | 01:10:43 +01:41 |
| Running 8 | 06:52 | 01:19:02 | 07:24 -00:32 | 01:16:59 +02:03 |
| Wall Balls | 10:30 | 01:25:54 | 08:11 +02:19 | 01:24:23 +01:31 |
| Roxzone | 05:11 | 01:41:26 | 08:52 -03:41 | 01:41:26 |
His overall race time was 01:41:26, and his total running time was 00:49:44. While his total running time was 2 minutes and 33 seconds slower than the average, it is worth noting that his total running time was faster than the average for his age group. This suggests that Paul has a stronger running profile compared to his peers.
In terms of pacing, Paul should aim to start the race at a steady pace to conserve energy for the later segments. It is essential for him to gauge his effort level and adjust accordingly to avoid fatigue. By pacing himself appropriately, Paul can ensure a strong finish in the race.
Overall, Paul should continue to focus on his running training to capitalize on his strength in this area. However, he should not neglect his strength training, particularly exercises that target the areas where he lost the most time. By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested exercises and drills, Paul can improve his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nelson Courtney | 2024 Malaga | 01:41:39 | |
| Jesaijes Mycha | 2024 Maastricht | 01:41:28 | |
| Shannon Edward | 2024 Madrid | 01:41:04 | |
| Kraft Stephan | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:41:00 | |
| Kret Radek | 2024 Dallas | 01:41:28 | |
| Tadeusz Wojciech | 2023 London | 01:41:27 | |
| Reinbold William | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:41:13 | |
| Goh Bervyn | 2023 Singapore | 01:41:15 | |
| Lyons George | 2023 Singapore | 01:41:56 | |
| Reißenweber Jonas | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:41:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
