Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcfarlane Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcfarlane Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcfarlane Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcfarlane Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:34 | 05:21 to 03:47 | 32.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:10 | 05:07 to 03:57 | 24.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:44 | 04:52 to 04:08 | 15.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:38 | 02:49 to 02:11 | 13.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:27 | 04:19 to 03:52 | 9.3% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 04:43 to 04:26 | 5.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:29 to 01:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 35:15 to 35:15 | 0.0% |
| Mcfarlane Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:03 | 00:00 | 04:11 +00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 05:03 | 04:17 +00:35 | 04:11 +00:52 |
| Running 2 | 04:06 | 09:55 | 04:28 -00:22 | 08:28 +01:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 14:01 | 02:34 +00:15 | 12:56 +01:05 |
| Running 3 | 04:20 | 16:50 | 04:51 -00:31 | 15:30 +01:20 |
| Sled Pull | 05:21 | 21:10 | 04:14 +01:07 | 20:21 +00:49 |
| Running 4 | 04:15 | 26:31 | 04:48 -00:33 | 24:35 +01:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:19 | 30:46 | 04:23 -00:04 | 29:23 +01:23 |
| Running 5 | 04:25 | 35:05 | 04:56 -00:31 | 33:46 +01:19 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 39:30 | 04:34 +00:09 | 38:42 +00:48 |
| Running 6 | 04:19 | 44:13 | 04:50 -00:31 | 43:16 +00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:29 | 48:32 | 01:55 -00:26 | 48:06 +00:26 |
| Running 7 | 04:27 | 50:01 | 04:49 -00:22 | 50:01 +00:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:07 | 54:28 | 04:22 +00:45 | 54:50 -00:22 |
| Running 8 | 04:23 | 59:35 | 05:11 -00:48 | 59:12 +00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 04:47 | 01:03:58 | 05:25 -00:38 | 01:04:23 -00:25 |
| Roxzone | 06:41 | 01:15:19 | 05:31 +01:10 | 01:15:19 |
Mark Mcfarlane demonstrated an impressive overall performance in the 2024 Madrid HYROX event, as highlighted by his overall rank of 209, placing him in the top 19% of 1065 athletes. In his age group of 60-64, he ranked 1, placing him in the top 10% of competitors. His overall race time was 01:15:19, with a total running time of 00:35:15, which is 03:04 faster than the average. This signals a clear strength in running, suggesting Mark has a runner’s profile. However, he should seek to improve his roxzone time, which is slower than average, indicating he took longer to rest or transition between exercise zones. This suggests that Mark could benefit from enhancing his overall fitness and transition times.
With regards to pacing, the first four running segments suggest that Mark started slightly slower than average, but improved his time as the race progressed, indicating a strong ability to sustain and even increase pace throughout the event.
Mark should consider implementing the following strategies for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bui Nam | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:14:52 | |
| Holmgren Thomas | 2024 Stockholm | 01:15:10 | |
| Wright Dan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:15:24 | |
| Ries Dimitri | 2024 Berlin | 01:15:21 | |
| Balaguer Alejandro | 2022 Madrid | 01:15:40 | |
| Hoek Bert | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:15:34 | |
| Wenzel Matthias | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:15:28 | |
| Voets Danny | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:15:00 | |
| Kälber Alexander | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:15:30 | |
| Mattei Alessandro | 2023 Milan | 01:15:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Milan | 01:19:49 | |
| 2024 Turin | 01:15:40 | |
| 2023 Madrid | 01:24:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
