Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Haynes Claire's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Haynes Claire's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Haynes Claire's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Haynes Claire's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:24 | 49:30 to 47:06 | 40.3% |
| Sled Pull | 02:06 | 07:51 to 05:45 | 35.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:58 | 03:43 to 02:45 | 16.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 02:43 to 02:14 | 8.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Haynes Claire | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 05:18 -00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 04:51 | 05:12 -00:05 | 05:18 -00:27 |
| Running 2 | 05:37 | 09:58 | 05:42 -00:05 | 10:30 -00:32 |
| Sled Push | 03:43 | 15:35 | 02:52 +00:51 | 16:12 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 06:36 | 19:18 | 06:02 +00:34 | 19:04 +00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 07:51 | 25:54 | 06:03 +01:48 | 25:06 +00:48 |
| Running 4 | 06:29 | 33:45 | 06:02 +00:27 | 31:09 +02:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:25 | 40:14 | 06:37 -01:12 | 37:11 +03:03 |
| Running 5 | 06:48 | 45:39 | 06:12 +00:36 | 43:48 +01:51 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 52:27 | 05:29 -00:11 | 50:00 +02:27 |
| Running 6 | 06:12 | 57:45 | 06:03 +00:09 | 55:29 +02:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:43 | 01:03:57 | 02:22 +00:21 | 01:01:32 +02:25 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 01:06:40 | 06:04 -00:09 | 01:03:54 +02:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:01 | 01:12:35 | 05:04 -01:03 | 01:09:58 +02:37 |
| Running 8 | 07:05 | 01:16:36 | 06:33 +00:32 | 01:15:02 +01:34 |
| Wall Balls | 04:23 | 01:23:41 | 05:23 -01:00 | 01:21:35 +02:06 |
| Roxzone | 06:25 | 01:34:21 | 07:23 -00:58 | 01:34:21 |
Her overall time of 01:34:21 is respectable, but there are areas where she can make improvements to further enhance her performance. Claire's total running time of 00:49:30 is 02:51 slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that she may benefit from focusing on improving her overall fitness and transition time.
Incorporating visualization techniques can also be helpful for Claire to mentally prepare for each segment of the race. By visualizing herself performing well and executing each exercise with proper form and efficiency, she can enhance her overall performance.
Lastly, Claire should consider working with a coach or trainer who can provide personalized guidance and support tailored to her specific goals and areas for improvement. A coach can help create a structured training plan, provide feedback on technique, and offer accountability and motivation throughout her training journey.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tavasolie Sajeh | 2018 Wien | 01:34:40 | |
| Hickey Lizzy | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:34:49 | |
| Morris Michelle | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:37 | |
| Van Heijster Anja | 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:48 | |
| Mozas Margot | 2024 Marseille | 01:34:28 | |
| Liu Xingni | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:34:42 | |
| Poulet Barbara | 2024 Paris | 01:33:56 | |
| Sarah Elhamine | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:48 | |
| Cuffe Linda | 2024 Dublin | 01:34:06 | |
| Mcadams Niki | 2024 Dallas | 01:34:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
