Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 917 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van De Kamp Eamon's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van De Kamp Eamon's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van De Kamp Eamon's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van De Kamp Eamon's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:37 | 55:03 to 50:26 | 57.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:06 | 09:11 to 07:05 | 26.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:13 | 09:47 to 08:34 | 15.3% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:17 to 05:15 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:34 to 02:34 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Van De Kamp Eamon | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:40 | 00:00 | 05:21 +01:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 06:40 | 04:45 -00:06 | 05:21 +01:19 |
| Running 2 | 06:29 | 11:19 | 05:55 +00:34 | 10:06 +01:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 17:48 | 03:36 -01:08 | 16:01 +01:47 |
| Running 3 | 06:46 | 20:16 | 06:30 +00:16 | 19:37 +00:39 |
| Sled Pull | 04:03 | 27:02 | 06:20 -02:17 | 26:07 +00:55 |
| Running 4 | 06:45 | 31:05 | 06:30 +00:15 | 32:27 -01:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:11 | 37:50 | 07:12 +01:59 | 38:57 -01:07 |
| Running 5 | 07:11 | 47:01 | 06:50 +00:21 | 46:09 +00:52 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 54:12 | 05:16 +00:01 | 52:59 +01:13 |
| Running 6 | 06:44 | 59:29 | 06:34 +00:10 | 58:15 +01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:34 | 01:06:13 | 02:41 -00:07 | 01:04:49 +01:24 |
| Running 7 | 06:37 | 01:08:47 | 06:33 +00:04 | 01:07:30 +01:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:59 | 01:15:24 | 06:47 -01:48 | 01:14:03 +01:21 |
| Running 8 | 07:55 | 01:20:23 | 07:54 +00:01 | 01:20:50 -00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 09:47 | 01:28:18 | 08:55 +00:52 | 01:28:44 -00:26 |
| Roxzone | 09:06 | 01:47:04 | 09:25 -00:19 | 01:47:04 |
In terms of pacing, Eamon's total running time was 00:55:03, which was 06:21 slower than the average. This suggests that he may have spent more time resting or taking longer transitions between exercise zones. To improve this segment, Eamon should focus on improving his overall fitness and reducing his transition time.
Overall, Eamon Van De Kamp has shown potential in the Hyrox race and with targeted training strategies and race strategies, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Soos Paul | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:47:04 | |
| Mcguire Mark | 2024 Madrid | 01:47:23 | |
| Anhalt Joerg | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:46:53 | |
| Oram Jason | 2024 Birmingham | 01:47:17 | |
| Lachevre Jonathan | 2024 Paris | 01:46:38 | |
| Riley Scott | 2023 Manchester | 01:47:24 | |
| Vollmerhausen Sascha | 2023 Stockholm | 01:46:52 | |
| Mabe Ethan | 2023 Dallas | 01:46:54 | |
| Cheng Marcus | 2024 Singapore | 01:47:15 | |
| Rostami Majid | 2023 Dublin | 01:46:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
