Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 742 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mills Morgan Anna's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mills Morgan Anna's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mills Morgan Anna's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mills Morgan Anna's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:39 | 08:56 to 07:17 | 37.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:20 | 07:50 to 06:30 | 30.2% |
| Run Total | 00:51 | 51:36 to 50:45 | 19.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:28 | 02:56 to 02:28 | 10.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:07 | 03:12 to 03:05 | 2.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Mills Morgan Anna | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:22 | 00:00 | 05:37 -01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 04:22 | 05:20 -00:28 | 05:37 -01:15 |
| Running 2 | 06:06 | 09:14 | 06:08 -00:02 | 10:57 -01:43 |
| Sled Push | 03:12 | 15:20 | 03:08 +00:04 | 17:05 -01:45 |
| Running 3 | 06:30 | 18:32 | 06:28 +00:02 | 20:13 -01:41 |
| Sled Pull | 07:50 | 25:02 | 06:42 +01:08 | 26:41 -01:39 |
| Running 4 | 06:51 | 32:52 | 06:32 +00:19 | 33:23 -00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:56 | 39:43 | 07:34 +01:22 | 39:55 -00:12 |
| Running 5 | 07:20 | 48:39 | 06:43 +00:37 | 47:29 +01:10 |
| Rowing | 05:34 | 55:59 | 05:40 -00:06 | 54:12 +01:47 |
| Running 6 | 06:25 | 01:01:33 | 06:34 -00:09 | 59:52 +01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:56 | 01:07:58 | 02:31 +00:25 | 01:06:26 +01:32 |
| Running 7 | 06:30 | 01:10:54 | 06:34 -00:04 | 01:08:57 +01:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:32 | 01:17:24 | 05:40 -00:08 | 01:15:31 +01:53 |
| Running 8 | 07:35 | 01:22:56 | 07:14 +00:21 | 01:21:11 +01:45 |
| Wall Balls | 04:51 | 01:30:31 | 06:06 -01:15 | 01:28:25 +02:06 |
| Roxzone | 07:35 | 01:42:50 | 08:19 -00:44 | 01:42:50 |
Anna's total running time of 00:51:36 was 01:49 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may need to focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time in order to decrease the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, her best running lap of 00:04:22 was 01:03 faster than average, suggesting that she excels in shorter bursts of running.
Overall, Anna Mills Morgan has shown great potential in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving her overall fitness, transitioning quickly between segments, and targeting specific areas for improvement, she can further enhance her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hernández Gera | 2024 Mexico City | 01:42:33 | |
| Sänger Liss | 2019 Hamburg | 01:42:32 | |
| Schumacher Jodi | 2024 Cape Town | 01:43:11 | |
| Martín Alvarez Belinda | 2024 Madrid | 01:43:00 | |
| Chua Kit Ying | 2024 Singapore | 01:43:01 | |
| Mackellar Helen | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:43:19 | |
| Lycklema Jeanet By | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:42:49 | |
| Cuevas Janisse | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:43:14 | |
| Hamblett Diane | 2024 Glasgow | 01:42:53 | |
| Hamilton Lauren | 2024 Manchester | 01:42:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
