Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kirschbaum Tobias's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kirschbaum Tobias's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kirschbaum Tobias's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kirschbaum Tobias's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:37 | 42:52 to 39:15 | 77.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:28 | 02:21 to 01:53 | 9.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:18 | 04:31 to 04:13 | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:24 to 04:16 | 2.8% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:43 to 04:35 | 2.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 02:30 to 02:27 | 1.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:24 to 03:24 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Kirschbaum Tobias | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:51 | 00:00 | 04:23 -00:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 03:51 | 04:21 +00:03 | 04:23 -00:32 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 08:15 | 04:43 +00:33 | 08:44 -00:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 13:31 | 02:44 -00:14 | 13:27 +00:04 |
| Running 3 | 05:40 | 16:01 | 05:07 +00:33 | 16:11 -00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 21:41 | 04:34 -00:03 | 21:18 +00:23 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 26:12 | 05:05 +00:23 | 25:52 +00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:21 | 31:40 | 04:53 -00:32 | 30:57 +00:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 36:01 | 05:14 +00:19 | 35:50 +00:11 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 41:34 | 04:40 +00:03 | 41:04 +00:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:27 | 46:17 | 05:07 +00:20 | 45:44 +00:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 51:44 | 02:03 +00:18 | 50:51 +00:53 |
| Running 7 | 05:28 | 54:05 | 05:05 +00:23 | 52:54 +01:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:24 | 59:33 | 04:43 -01:19 | 57:59 +01:34 |
| Running 8 | 06:13 | 01:02:57 | 05:34 +00:39 | 01:02:42 +00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 05:04 | 01:09:10 | 05:57 -00:53 | 01:08:16 +00:54 |
| Roxzone | 06:14 | 01:20:21 | 06:08 +00:06 | 01:20:21 |
In terms of his running performance, Tobias' total running time of 00:42:52 was slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may benefit from focusing more on his running training to improve his overall fitness and speed. Additionally, his running splits (Running 1, Running 2, etc.) were consistently slower than the average, suggesting that he should prioritize running workouts in his training routine.
In conclusion, Tobias Kirschbaum had a commendable performance in the HYROX race in Amsterdam. To improve his performance, he should focus on improving his overall fitness, transition time, and running speed. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, long-distance runs, and strength exercises, can help him enhance his performance in the identified segments. Implementing race strategies such as pacing himself, focusing on form, and prioritizing recovery will also contribute to better performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenidge Lee | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:52 | |
| Campos Alex | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:20:13 | |
| Marcos Muñoz Juan | 2021 Madrid | 01:20:01 | |
| Van Der Ent Sven | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:20 | |
| Mckenna James | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:58 | |
| Fairman Tom | 2024 Stockholm | 01:20:30 | |
| Guis David | 2022 Basel | 01:20:34 | |
| Missotten Laurent | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:20:47 | |
| Komosinski Lukasz | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:20:36 | |
| Jaster Kay | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:19:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Frankfurt | 01:18:53 | |
| 2022 Maastricht | 01:23:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
