Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hind Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hind Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hind Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hind Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:43 | 47:02 to 42:19 | 86.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 05:25 to 04:57 | 8.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 05:26 to 05:09 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:45 to 05:45 | 0.0% |
| Hind Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:52 | 00:00 | 04:42 -00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 03:52 | 04:28 -00:24 | 04:42 -00:50 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 07:56 | 05:02 +00:30 | 09:10 -01:14 |
| Sled Push | 01:58 | 13:28 | 02:57 -00:59 | 14:12 -00:44 |
| Running 3 | 06:00 | 15:26 | 05:29 +00:31 | 17:09 -01:43 |
| Sled Pull | 04:15 | 21:26 | 05:02 -00:47 | 22:38 -01:12 |
| Running 4 | 06:04 | 25:41 | 05:28 +00:36 | 27:40 -01:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:26 | 31:45 | 05:26 +00:00 | 33:08 -01:23 |
| Running 5 | 06:32 | 37:11 | 05:39 +00:53 | 38:34 -01:23 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 43:43 | 04:52 -00:10 | 44:13 -00:30 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 48:25 | 05:30 +00:37 | 49:05 -00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 54:32 | 02:13 -00:21 | 54:35 -00:03 |
| Running 7 | 06:10 | 56:24 | 05:28 +00:42 | 56:48 -00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:02:34 | 05:13 +00:12 | 01:02:16 +00:18 |
| Running 8 | 06:49 | 01:07:59 | 06:07 +00:42 | 01:07:29 +00:30 |
| Wall Balls | 05:45 | 01:14:48 | 06:38 -00:53 | 01:13:36 +01:12 |
| Roxzone | 06:52 | 01:27:16 | 07:02 -00:10 | 01:27:16 |
Matt Hind, competing in the 40-44 age group, displayed a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race. Matt secured an overall rank of 815 out of 1203 participants, placing him in the top 67%. In his age group, he ranked 112 out of 169, putting him in the leading 66%.
Matt demonstrated a stronger proficiency in strength-based exercises compared to running, with his total running time being 03:25 slower than the average. This was evidenced by his performance in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls segments where he consistently finished faster than the average times. However, in the running segments, Matt generally ran slower than the average times.
In terms of pacing, Matt seemed to start the race at a faster pace, as evidenced by his first running segment (00:50 faster than average). However, as the race progressed, he consistently lost time in the running segments, indicating a need to improve his endurance and pacing strategy.
Matt should consider implementing the following strategies in his future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parfier Fabien | 2024 Marseille | 01:26:55 | |
| Giffen Tim | 2023 London | 01:27:39 | |
| Heineke Jörn | 2021 Hamburg | 01:27:19 | |
| Navarro Garcia Javier | 2023 Valencia | 01:27:03 | |
| Batey Joe | 2023 London | 01:27:38 | |
| Roberts Joe | 2022 London | 01:26:49 | |
| Nolte Adrian | 2019 Hamburg | 01:27:40 | |
| Brien Aaron | 2022 London | 01:27:21 | |
| Marques Pedro | 2024 Madrid | 01:27:44 | |
| Wagener Hendrik | 2024 Hamburg | 01:27:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:27:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
