Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 549 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Woodcraft Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Woodcraft Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Woodcraft Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Woodcraft Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:11 | 55:14 to 53:03 | 33.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:28 | 08:32 to 07:04 | 22.6% |
| Sled Push | 01:18 | 05:15 to 03:57 | 20.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:48 | 10:08 to 09:20 | 12.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:44 | 03:38 to 02:54 | 11.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:20 to 07:20 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Woodcraft Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:49 | 00:00 | 05:35 +00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 05:49 | 04:51 -00:22 | 05:35 +00:14 |
| Running 2 | 06:01 | 10:18 | 06:15 -00:14 | 10:26 -00:08 |
| Sled Push | 05:15 | 16:19 | 03:49 +01:26 | 16:41 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 06:52 | 21:34 | 06:59 -00:07 | 20:30 +01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:15 | 28:26 | 06:40 -01:25 | 27:29 +00:57 |
| Running 4 | 07:01 | 33:41 | 06:56 +00:05 | 34:09 -00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:20 | 40:42 | 07:57 -00:37 | 41:05 -00:23 |
| Running 5 | 07:03 | 48:02 | 07:19 -00:16 | 49:02 -01:00 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 55:05 | 05:25 -00:40 | 56:21 -01:16 |
| Running 6 | 07:15 | 59:50 | 07:01 +00:14 | 01:01:46 -01:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:38 | 01:07:05 | 02:52 +00:46 | 01:08:47 -01:42 |
| Running 7 | 07:05 | 01:10:43 | 07:03 +00:02 | 01:11:39 -00:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:32 | 01:17:48 | 07:15 +01:17 | 01:18:42 -00:54 |
| Running 8 | 08:12 | 01:26:20 | 08:50 -00:38 | 01:25:57 +00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 10:08 | 01:34:32 | 09:30 +00:38 | 01:34:47 -00:15 |
| Roxzone | 10:31 | 01:55:03 | 10:46 -00:15 | 01:55:03 |
Best Lap and Running 1: Tom's best running lap time of 00:05:49 was 00:30 slower than the average. To improve his running performance, he should focus on improving his overall running endurance and speed. Incorporating interval training, such as tempo runs and interval sprints, can help improve cardiovascular endurance and speed. Additionally, working on running form and efficiency, including stride length and cadence, can help improve running performance.
Running 6: Tom's time of 00:07:15 for running 6 was 00:21 slower than the average. To improve this segment, he should focus on improving his overall running endurance and speed. Incorporating long-distance runs and interval training into his training routine can help improve cardiovascular endurance and speed. Additionally, working on running form and efficiency, including stride length and cadence, can help improve running performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| herman paul | 2020 Dallas | 01:54:36 | |
| Giesau Stephan | 2018 Hamburg | 01:55:20 | |
| Salinas Diego | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:54:33 | |
| Yosfan Ari | 2024 Hamburg | 01:54:49 | |
| Liow Raymond | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:54:40 | |
| 谢 熙今 | 2024 Beijing | 01:54:40 | |
| Treglown Luke | 2023 London | 01:55:01 | |
| Eddins Cody | 2022 Dallas | 01:55:03 | |
| De Jong Auke | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:55:00 | |
| Soni Vinnie | 2024 Manchester | 01:55:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:51:58 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
