Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore National Stadium using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 91 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wong Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wong Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wong Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wong Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 15:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:32 | 01:05:58 to 58:26 | 47.1% |
| Sled Pull | 05:14 | 12:54 to 07:40 | 32.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:23 | 04:38 to 03:15 | 8.7% |
| Sled Push | 01:07 | 05:38 to 04:31 | 7.0% |
| Rowing | 00:35 | 06:15 to 05:40 | 3.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 05:13 to 05:05 | 0.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:03 to 08:03 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 07:31 to 07:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 09:29 to 09:29 | 0.0% |
| Wong Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 09:32 | 00:00 | 06:05 +03:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:13 | 09:32 | 05:10 +00:03 | 06:05 +03:27 |
| Running 2 | 08:20 | 14:45 | 07:25 +00:55 | 11:15 +03:30 |
| Sled Push | 05:38 | 23:05 | 04:34 +01:04 | 18:40 +04:25 |
| Running 3 | 08:08 | 28:43 | 08:31 -00:23 | 23:14 +05:29 |
| Sled Pull | 12:54 | 36:51 | 08:17 +04:37 | 31:45 +05:06 |
| Running 4 | 07:13 | 49:45 | 08:34 -01:21 | 40:02 +09:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:03 | 56:58 | 09:33 -01:30 | 48:36 +08:22 |
| Running 5 | 08:49 | 01:05:01 | 09:08 -00:19 | 58:09 +06:52 |
| Rowing | 06:15 | 01:13:50 | 05:53 +00:22 | 01:07:17 +06:33 |
| Running 6 | 07:46 | 01:20:05 | 08:40 -00:54 | 01:13:10 +06:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:38 | 01:27:51 | 03:16 +01:22 | 01:21:50 +06:01 |
| Running 7 | 07:37 | 01:32:29 | 08:43 -01:06 | 01:25:06 +07:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:31 | 01:40:06 | 08:54 -01:23 | 01:33:49 +06:17 |
| Running 8 | 08:35 | 01:47:37 | 11:57 -03:22 | 01:42:43 +04:54 |
| Wall Balls | 09:29 | 01:56:12 | 11:47 -02:18 | 01:54:40 +01:32 |
| Roxzone | 13:42 | 02:19:16 | 12:49 +00:53 | 02:19:16 |
Tom Wong demonstrated a strong running profile, evident from his total running time of 01:05:58, which was 03:20 faster than the average. His best running lap was an impressive 00:07:13. However, he is positioned in the top 70% overall and top 71% in his age group, suggesting that while his running is strong, his strength segments need improvement. The data indicates that Tom started the race too slow, as seen in Running 1, but quickly adjusted his pace in subsequent segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moore Peter | 2022 Birmingham | 02:19:44 | |
| El Helwe Abdel Hady | 2024 Turin | 02:19:32 | |
| Di Gennaro Francesco | 2024 Milan | 02:19:34 | |
| Connor Mark | 2024 Glasgow | 02:18:52 | |
| Obrien Luke | 2024 Melbourne | 02:18:59 | |
| Carbajal Dominic | 2024 Anaheim | 02:18:49 | |
| Quinlan Terry | 2024 Dublin | 02:19:26 | |
| Skeats Liam | 2022 London | 02:19:27 | |
| Taylor Richard | 2023 London | 02:19:38 | |
| 周 钦 | 2024 Beijing | 02:19:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Singapore | 01:53:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
